<p>Hands-on activities promote interest in engineering, but their use in primary education is under pressure due to doubts about their effect on learning. Based on the Challenge Point Framework, we hypothesized that an adaptive approach in which a pupil starts with tasks at its level of prior knowledge would raise the learning results of hands-on activities. This hypothesis was tested in a lesson about electric circuits. Two experiments were carried out that compared the adaptive with non-adaptive approaches. Skill levels of 444 nine to twelve-year-old pupils were measured with a performance-based task before and after a lesson in which they worked individually on tasks that matched or did not match their level of prior knowledge. Questionnaires were used to asses challenge adequacy. Skill levels were significantly higher at the post-test and a six-month delayed post-test but only for low performers on the pre-test. Starting with tasks that transcended the level of prior knowledge with a single level offered the optimal challenge for pupils with low levels of prior knowledge but reduced the results for pupils who knew more about electric circuits.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Adapting the difficulty of hands-on tasks to pupils’ prior knowledge: effects on challenge and skill development

  • Dannie Wammes,
  • Liesbeth Kester,
  • Bert Slof

摘要

Hands-on activities promote interest in engineering, but their use in primary education is under pressure due to doubts about their effect on learning. Based on the Challenge Point Framework, we hypothesized that an adaptive approach in which a pupil starts with tasks at its level of prior knowledge would raise the learning results of hands-on activities. This hypothesis was tested in a lesson about electric circuits. Two experiments were carried out that compared the adaptive with non-adaptive approaches. Skill levels of 444 nine to twelve-year-old pupils were measured with a performance-based task before and after a lesson in which they worked individually on tasks that matched or did not match their level of prior knowledge. Questionnaires were used to asses challenge adequacy. Skill levels were significantly higher at the post-test and a six-month delayed post-test but only for low performers on the pre-test. Starting with tasks that transcended the level of prior knowledge with a single level offered the optimal challenge for pupils with low levels of prior knowledge but reduced the results for pupils who knew more about electric circuits.