Purpose <p>To evaluate static and dynamic pupillometry parameters using Scheimpflug-based imaging in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and to correlate these parameters with the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and glycemic control.</p> Methods <p>This was a cross-sectional, case–control study including 141 diabetic patients (282 eyes) and 91 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (182 eyes). Static pupillometry (SP) was assessed under scotopic, mesopic, and photopic conditions, while dynamic pupillometry (DP) measured pupillary diameter changes following a light stimulus. Pupillometry parameters were analyzed across different DR severity grades and correlated with metabolic markers including duration of diabetes, fasting blood sugar (FBS), postprandial blood sugar (PPBS), and HbA1c.</p> Results <p>Diabetic patients showed significantly reduced mean scotopic, mesopic, and photopic pupil diameters compared to controls (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Dynamic pupillary diameter was significantly smaller in patients with moderate NPDR compared to those with no DR (<i>p</i> = 0.03). A significant negative correlation was observed between dynamic pupillary diameter and both FBS (r = –0.34, <i>p</i> = 0.009) and duration of diabetes (r = –0.41, <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p> Conclusion <p>Diabetic patients demonstrate impaired static and dynamic pupillary responses, which worsen with increasing DR severity and poorer short-term glycemic control. Scheimpflug-based pupillometry may serve as a non-invasive adjunctive tool for assessing early ocular changes in diabetes and monitoring disease progression.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Association of Scheimpflug-based pupillometry with Severity of diabetic retinopathy and regulation of diabetes: A case–control study

  • Anchal Tripathi,
  • Avinash Mishra,
  • Mohini Agrawal,
  • Atul Bhirud,
  • Sandeep Gupta,
  • J. K. S. Parihar

摘要

Purpose

To evaluate static and dynamic pupillometry parameters using Scheimpflug-based imaging in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and to correlate these parameters with the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and glycemic control.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional, case–control study including 141 diabetic patients (282 eyes) and 91 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (182 eyes). Static pupillometry (SP) was assessed under scotopic, mesopic, and photopic conditions, while dynamic pupillometry (DP) measured pupillary diameter changes following a light stimulus. Pupillometry parameters were analyzed across different DR severity grades and correlated with metabolic markers including duration of diabetes, fasting blood sugar (FBS), postprandial blood sugar (PPBS), and HbA1c.

Results

Diabetic patients showed significantly reduced mean scotopic, mesopic, and photopic pupil diameters compared to controls (p < 0.001). Dynamic pupillary diameter was significantly smaller in patients with moderate NPDR compared to those with no DR (p = 0.03). A significant negative correlation was observed between dynamic pupillary diameter and both FBS (r = –0.34, p = 0.009) and duration of diabetes (r = –0.41, p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Diabetic patients demonstrate impaired static and dynamic pupillary responses, which worsen with increasing DR severity and poorer short-term glycemic control. Scheimpflug-based pupillometry may serve as a non-invasive adjunctive tool for assessing early ocular changes in diabetes and monitoring disease progression.