<p>Phishing attacks remain a persistent threat in cybersecurity, exploiting human psychology to extract confidential information. Conventional machine learning and Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches often rely on rigid binary reward structures that oversimplify phishing behavior and demand extensive datasets, limiting their practical deployment. This paper presents <i>HARE (Human-guided Adaptive Reinforcement for Engineering)</i>, an RL-based framework that integrates human feedback to adaptively shape the agent’s reward signal. By incorporating scalar, context-aware guidance from experts, HARE enables faster convergence with fewer samples, improves adaptability to evolving phishing tactics, and captures subtle behavioral cues frequently missed by automated detectors. Experimental evaluation on the publicly available PhiUSIIL dataset shows that HARE achieves an F1-score of 97.62% with a false positive rate of 2.55%, confirming its reliability and data efficiency for adaptive phishing detection.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Human in the loop reinforcement learning framework for adaptive phishing detection

  • Sohail Khan

摘要

Phishing attacks remain a persistent threat in cybersecurity, exploiting human psychology to extract confidential information. Conventional machine learning and Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches often rely on rigid binary reward structures that oversimplify phishing behavior and demand extensive datasets, limiting their practical deployment. This paper presents HARE (Human-guided Adaptive Reinforcement for Engineering), an RL-based framework that integrates human feedback to adaptively shape the agent’s reward signal. By incorporating scalar, context-aware guidance from experts, HARE enables faster convergence with fewer samples, improves adaptability to evolving phishing tactics, and captures subtle behavioral cues frequently missed by automated detectors. Experimental evaluation on the publicly available PhiUSIIL dataset shows that HARE achieves an F1-score of 97.62% with a false positive rate of 2.55%, confirming its reliability and data efficiency for adaptive phishing detection.