Scholarlink

<p>This is a commentary on Samuel Scheffler’s <i>One Life to Lead</i>, focusing on Chap.&#xa0;2 of that book. The piece focuses on Scheffler’s conditional acceptance of a revised form of Parfit’s ‘excellent argument’ and suggests that there are more fundamental reasons to reject Parfit’s endorsement of temporal neutrality than arise from our relationships.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

All in Good Time

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月21日

查看全文
  • M G F Martin

摘要

This is a commentary on Samuel Scheffler’s One Life to Lead, focusing on Chap. 2 of that book. The piece focuses on Scheffler’s conditional acceptance of a revised form of Parfit’s ‘excellent argument’ and suggests that there are more fundamental reasons to reject Parfit’s endorsement of temporal neutrality than arise from our relationships.