Scholarlink

<p>Over the past several decades, a dramatic cultural shift has taken place in the West: therapeutic ideals now shape public discourse. Practices such as mindfulness meditation and yoga have gone mainstream, and the wellness industry – now a multi-trillion-dollar market – continues to expand. How can we understand the prominence and legitimacy of practices and values once associated with countercultural forces? This article highlights the paradox of the New Age movement, an anti-institutional spiritual movement from the 1960s and 1970s whose values have since become institutionalized. This article reviews and synthesizes existing literature to examine the enduring legacy of the New Age movement. Using a cultural sociological framework, it analyzes how seemingly distinct discourses are organized within a broader cultural structure, identifying a dominant cultural code that valorizes inner experience and personal authority, spirituality, authenticity, and self-transformation across three institutional spheres: medicine, business, and education. The analysis demonstrates that what this article terms New Age ideology – understood as a cultural code that emphasizes inner experience, personal authority, spiritual holism, emotional authenticity, and self-transformation, while blending spiritual and therapeutic ideas with values of self-improvement, optimization, and personal responsibility – circulates across the spheres of medicine, business and education. By tracing the diffusion of New Age ideology across institutional domains, this article shows that the New Age movement’s significance lies in the normalization of its values within public culture. In this sense, the mainstreaming of once countercultural ideals constitutes evidence of the New Age movement’s success. The article concludes by outlining directions for future research, including the globalization of New Age ideology, its articulation in different socio-cultural contexts, a re-evaluation of the legacy of the Therapeutic Turn, and the broader implications of the New Age for the sociological study of contemporary spirituality.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Living in the New Age: The Mainstreaming of the Counterculture and the Institutionalization of New Age Ideology

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月16日

查看全文
  • Sarah Badr

摘要

Over the past several decades, a dramatic cultural shift has taken place in the West: therapeutic ideals now shape public discourse. Practices such as mindfulness meditation and yoga have gone mainstream, and the wellness industry – now a multi-trillion-dollar market – continues to expand. How can we understand the prominence and legitimacy of practices and values once associated with countercultural forces? This article highlights the paradox of the New Age movement, an anti-institutional spiritual movement from the 1960s and 1970s whose values have since become institutionalized. This article reviews and synthesizes existing literature to examine the enduring legacy of the New Age movement. Using a cultural sociological framework, it analyzes how seemingly distinct discourses are organized within a broader cultural structure, identifying a dominant cultural code that valorizes inner experience and personal authority, spirituality, authenticity, and self-transformation across three institutional spheres: medicine, business, and education. The analysis demonstrates that what this article terms New Age ideology – understood as a cultural code that emphasizes inner experience, personal authority, spiritual holism, emotional authenticity, and self-transformation, while blending spiritual and therapeutic ideas with values of self-improvement, optimization, and personal responsibility – circulates across the spheres of medicine, business and education. By tracing the diffusion of New Age ideology across institutional domains, this article shows that the New Age movement’s significance lies in the normalization of its values within public culture. In this sense, the mainstreaming of once countercultural ideals constitutes evidence of the New Age movement’s success. The article concludes by outlining directions for future research, including the globalization of New Age ideology, its articulation in different socio-cultural contexts, a re-evaluation of the legacy of the Therapeutic Turn, and the broader implications of the New Age for the sociological study of contemporary spirituality.