<p>Despite widespread endorsement of student participation as a pillar of democratic education, its implementation remains largely symbolic of a participatory ethos rather than a performative practice. This study examines the normative, pedagogical, and institutional factors influencing teachers’ willingness to support democratic student participation in school decision-making. Using a cross-sectional survey of 331 Austrian primary and secondary teachers, a theory-driven questionnaire co-developed with a participatory resonance group assessed conceptions of democracy, types of participation, perceived challenges, expected outcomes, and views on school development. Principal Component Analyses reduced the data, and Multiple Linear Regression identified predictors, explaining 44% of the variance. Teachers’ commitment to social justice and protection of vulnerable groups, their belief in participation as institutional learning, and support for student involvement in governance and classroom processes emerged as key predictors. Urban location and available participatory structures also influenced support, whereas concerns over control, workload, or student disinterest did not. The results highlight teacher support as shaped by ethical, pedagogical, and structural dimensions.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The Anticipated Impact of Participatory Democratic Education: an Empirical Study of Teacher Beliefs and Implementation Barriers

  • Rita Phillips

摘要

Despite widespread endorsement of student participation as a pillar of democratic education, its implementation remains largely symbolic of a participatory ethos rather than a performative practice. This study examines the normative, pedagogical, and institutional factors influencing teachers’ willingness to support democratic student participation in school decision-making. Using a cross-sectional survey of 331 Austrian primary and secondary teachers, a theory-driven questionnaire co-developed with a participatory resonance group assessed conceptions of democracy, types of participation, perceived challenges, expected outcomes, and views on school development. Principal Component Analyses reduced the data, and Multiple Linear Regression identified predictors, explaining 44% of the variance. Teachers’ commitment to social justice and protection of vulnerable groups, their belief in participation as institutional learning, and support for student involvement in governance and classroom processes emerged as key predictors. Urban location and available participatory structures also influenced support, whereas concerns over control, workload, or student disinterest did not. The results highlight teacher support as shaped by ethical, pedagogical, and structural dimensions.