The Limit-Experience of the Stranger. A Critical Perspective on the “Us/Them” Divide

The “we” is not only a way of calling people together. The “we” tends also to perform acts of exclusion. According to political studies, the antagonism resulting from this process is ineradicable and leads by necessity to fragmentation both within and between groups — the ultimate example of the friend/enemy divide conceptualized by Carl Schmitt. Nowadays, however, the increasing great migratory processes produced by globalization intensifying the formation of multicultural societies demand a re-examination of such a political view and call for new pathways for the future. Once this is recognized, the problem we encounter is the following: can we think of nothing else along the boundaries between ‘us’ and ‘them,’ but an antithesis, nothing else but an antagonism? Under what conditions, “from within what axiomatic” (Derrida, The politics of friendship. Verso, 2005), can political thinkers be assured that the us/them relation is by necessity one of hostility and exteriority? How does contemporary philosophy offer new viewpoints coming from old insights? With a view to address these questions, this paper set up a dialogue between Bernhard Waldenfels and Jacques Derrida around the limit-experience of the stranger and probe their reflections on its in-between position — in-between the enemy and the guest — as a challenge to the antagonistic view of the “us/them” divide as well as to the logic of binary opposition that informs it.