<p>This paper examines pastoralist-led strategies to secure access to land and resources in contexts of limited tenure security. Efforts to secure land access for pastoralists through statutory frameworks often fall short, necessitating a rethinking of approaches to support marginalized and less vocal groups. To address this, we present a framework for systematically analyzing pastoralist strategies, with four guiding elements: contextual drivers of land pressure, agency and networks that stakeholders mobilize, the characteristics of specific strategies, and their impacts. Using case studies, we highlight how external and internal pressures such as climate change, conflict, and shifting market dynamics intersect with localized motivations and tactics to shape diverse responses. Findings indicate a significant gap in systematic evidence on the impacts and outcomes of pastoralist strategies. While anecdotal evidence exists, rigorous analysis of these outcomes remains rare, particularly at levels ranging from societal impacts to family and individual outcomes. The paper also underscores the need to categorize strategies more precisely for comparative analysis and distinguish between group and individual actions. Understanding these strategies is critical because they reveal both the potential and limitations of local mobilization efforts and their implications for social relations. Insights into these strategies can inform policies and interventions that strengthen pastoralist rights, particularly group rights, where local approaches have proven effective.</p>