Scholarlink

<p>Modern technology has expanded the armamentarium of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices implemented for hemodynamic stabilization of patients in cardiogenic shock. The predominately used ones are intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), Impella devices, and extracorporeal life support (ECLS) circuits. They are transcutaneous or surgically implanted, utilized for up to 30 days and can either assist or totally replace cardiac function, providing time for myocardial healing (bridge to recovery) or treatment escalation (bridge to destination therapy, bridge to transplantation). In light of the recently published joint consensus of the Perioperative Quality Initiative and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Cardiac Society on temporary mechanical circulatory support, purpose of the current review is to provide a succinct head-to-head comparison of widely available devices, as well as current escalation, de-escalation and antithrombotic protocols; thus, it proposes immediately translatable device selection and operation algorithms to medical professionals for optimal patient care and effective management of cardiogenic shock.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: a contemporary head-to-head comparison

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月24日

查看全文
  • Stavroula A. Siopi,
  • Polychronis Antonitsis,
  • Georgios T. Karapanagiotidis,
  • Georgios Tagarakis,
  • Christos Voucharas,
  • Kyriakos Anastasiadis

摘要

Modern technology has expanded the armamentarium of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices implemented for hemodynamic stabilization of patients in cardiogenic shock. The predominately used ones are intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), Impella devices, and extracorporeal life support (ECLS) circuits. They are transcutaneous or surgically implanted, utilized for up to 30 days and can either assist or totally replace cardiac function, providing time for myocardial healing (bridge to recovery) or treatment escalation (bridge to destination therapy, bridge to transplantation). In light of the recently published joint consensus of the Perioperative Quality Initiative and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Cardiac Society on temporary mechanical circulatory support, purpose of the current review is to provide a succinct head-to-head comparison of widely available devices, as well as current escalation, de-escalation and antithrombotic protocols; thus, it proposes immediately translatable device selection and operation algorithms to medical professionals for optimal patient care and effective management of cardiogenic shock.