<p>Heart failure (HF), a chronic and progressive disease, is increasing in prevalence worldwide and is associated with increased hospitalizations and death. Despite notable improvements in medical therapy for HF, patients are still at risk of future negative outcomes. Current guidelines recommend four classes of medication for treating patients with HF, deemed guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). The use and adherence of these GDMTs serve as a major predictor of outcomes in those with chronic HF; however, implementation of therapy remains poor, despite substantial evidence of benefit. The acute hospitalization for HF and the subsequent vulnerable period serve as important milestones for adequate disease modification, and implementing a strategy for aggressive medical therapy can improve HF outcomes. Current guidelines also recommend that follow-up with&#xa0;multidisciplinary chronic disease management specific to HF be provided to those living with heart failure, which is essential for improving readmissions and mortality. This follow-up, although important by itself, serves as an important avenue for disease modification through medication titration, and implementing such structured follow-up is essential for further population-wide improvements in HF mortality. In this context, the STRONG-HF trial investigators developed an implementation trial providing evidence for the rapid inpatient initiation and subsequent titration of HF GDMT, demonstrating the importance of implementation strategies in the care of HF patients. In this narrative review, we review the evidence base for treating patients with HF, highlight deficits in our current real-world experience, and provide support for trial evidence like STRONG-HF in the global fight to reduce the burden of HF.</p>