Scholarlink

<p>Clinical ethics committees support ethical decision-making in healthcare. In the DACH region (Germany, Austria, Switzerland), their adoption is growing, but factors shaping implementation and daily functioning remain underexplored. Development has been uneven, and little is known about what drives it. This qualitative study examined influences on committee adoption, implementation, and routine practice. Semi structured expert interviews were conducted with committee representatives and researchers, then analysed using thematic qualitative text analysis in MAXQDA, identifying six key themes. The adoption is driven by bottom-up and top-down initiatives, external pioneers, societal debates, certification demands, and resources. Efficient implementation relied on leadership, protected time and funding, committee member role clarity, and visibility through early activities. Everyday functioning depended on member motivation, clinician acceptance, staffing, training, networking, and regulatory and cultural factors. Evaluation of their activities was frequently emphasized but often constrained by limited resources. Legal and regulatory requirements were also debated: mandates could promote establishment but risk tokenism, making softer mechanisms preferable. Future directions emphasized professionalization, billing options, care integration, organizational models, and systematic evaluation. Sustainable, high-quality committee functioning requires coordinated action across policy and institutional levels, alongside clinician engagement and evaluation capacity. These empirically grounded insights provide practical strategies for managers and policymakers to strengthen clinical ethics infrastructure in the DACH context.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Embedding Clinical Ethics: A Qualitative Study of the Adoption, Implementation, and Everyday Functioning of Clinical Ethics Committees in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月1日

查看全文
  • Gilles Bernard,
  • Michael Fischer

摘要

Clinical ethics committees support ethical decision-making in healthcare. In the DACH region (Germany, Austria, Switzerland), their adoption is growing, but factors shaping implementation and daily functioning remain underexplored. Development has been uneven, and little is known about what drives it. This qualitative study examined influences on committee adoption, implementation, and routine practice. Semi structured expert interviews were conducted with committee representatives and researchers, then analysed using thematic qualitative text analysis in MAXQDA, identifying six key themes. The adoption is driven by bottom-up and top-down initiatives, external pioneers, societal debates, certification demands, and resources. Efficient implementation relied on leadership, protected time and funding, committee member role clarity, and visibility through early activities. Everyday functioning depended on member motivation, clinician acceptance, staffing, training, networking, and regulatory and cultural factors. Evaluation of their activities was frequently emphasized but often constrained by limited resources. Legal and regulatory requirements were also debated: mandates could promote establishment but risk tokenism, making softer mechanisms preferable. Future directions emphasized professionalization, billing options, care integration, organizational models, and systematic evaluation. Sustainable, high-quality committee functioning requires coordinated action across policy and institutional levels, alongside clinician engagement and evaluation capacity. These empirically grounded insights provide practical strategies for managers and policymakers to strengthen clinical ethics infrastructure in the DACH context.