Scholarlink

<p>This paper endeavors to engage Complexity Theory (CT) and Critical Realism (CR) in a constructive dialogue, aiming to build bridges between the two epistemological premises. CT, as a new perspective, is being endorsed in various fields, including the social sciences, where a shift from a linear, mechanistic and reductionist view, towards a recognition of the complex and dynamic nature of social processes, is realized. More specifically, this study examines the commonalities and distinctions between CT and CR, highlighting their complementary strengths. By exploring their potential integration, the paper argues for a beneficial merger that could result in a unified framework. Such a framework would also align with contemporary philosophical and scientific thought, offering a more robust understanding of complex social phenomena. Ultimately, this dialogue seeks to inspire further interdisciplinary research, foster a deeper engagement with the epistemological and ontological challenges and encourage ongoing academic discourse that bridges theoretical divides.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Merger of Critical Realism and Complexity Theory: Laying the Foundations for a Unified Ontological and Epistemological Perspective for the Study of Social Systems

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月11日

查看全文
  • Maria Gkevrou,
  • Dimitrios Stamovlasis

摘要

This paper endeavors to engage Complexity Theory (CT) and Critical Realism (CR) in a constructive dialogue, aiming to build bridges between the two epistemological premises. CT, as a new perspective, is being endorsed in various fields, including the social sciences, where a shift from a linear, mechanistic and reductionist view, towards a recognition of the complex and dynamic nature of social processes, is realized. More specifically, this study examines the commonalities and distinctions between CT and CR, highlighting their complementary strengths. By exploring their potential integration, the paper argues for a beneficial merger that could result in a unified framework. Such a framework would also align with contemporary philosophical and scientific thought, offering a more robust understanding of complex social phenomena. Ultimately, this dialogue seeks to inspire further interdisciplinary research, foster a deeper engagement with the epistemological and ontological challenges and encourage ongoing academic discourse that bridges theoretical divides.