<p>There is a controversy concerning the role of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation (BOA) in quantum chemistry molecular orbital calculations. Some philosophers argue that because the BOA <i>clamps</i> the position of the nuclei in space the BOA <i>fixes</i> the outcome of the calculation, thus calling into question the calculation’s legitimacy. As a contribution to the debate, we perform a thermochemical analysis to determine the absolute energies of the quantum Hamiltonian operator, <i>Ĥψ</i>, in kJmol<sup>–1</sup>, with respect to the constitutional isomers ethanol and dimethyl ether and their constituent particles. Our results show that the difference between the quantum Hamiltonian enthalpies, the Δ<sub>QH</sub><i>H</i>, is tiny: − 407,023 kJmol<sup>–1</sup> vs. − 407,116 kJmol<sup>–1</sup>, a 0.02% difference. This is far smaller than the ~ 1% chemical error deemed acceptable/tolerable in many chemical procedures and calculations.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Concerning the question: does quantum mechanics predict molecular structure? An examination of the energetics

  • Mark R. Leach

摘要

There is a controversy concerning the role of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation (BOA) in quantum chemistry molecular orbital calculations. Some philosophers argue that because the BOA clamps the position of the nuclei in space the BOA fixes the outcome of the calculation, thus calling into question the calculation’s legitimacy. As a contribution to the debate, we perform a thermochemical analysis to determine the absolute energies of the quantum Hamiltonian operator, Ĥψ, in kJmol–1, with respect to the constitutional isomers ethanol and dimethyl ether and their constituent particles. Our results show that the difference between the quantum Hamiltonian enthalpies, the ΔQHH, is tiny: − 407,023 kJmol–1 vs. − 407,116 kJmol–1, a 0.02% difference. This is far smaller than the ~ 1% chemical error deemed acceptable/tolerable in many chemical procedures and calculations.