Scholarlink

<p>Feminist research in ‘difficult’ sites where violence regularly occurs is complex and nuanced. Using ethnographic vignettes from my research into the socio-legal organisation of involuntary psychiatric admission in Poland, I discuss the ethical challenges and dilemmas I encountered while witnessing frequent violations of admitted persons’ rights and trying to respond to those situations appropriately. I struggled to uphold my feminist commitment to social justice while navigating these complexities. The concept of <i>wide reflexivity</i> (also called <i>robust reflexivity</i>), can help feminist legal researchers attend to “fragile moments from the field” (Hahn in Atlantis 30:88–99, <CitationRef CitationID="CR28">2006</CitationRef>) and unpack their social organisation. Ultimately, I suggest that by attending to these ‘sticky’ moments and being transparent about our fieldwork decisions and actions, especially the uncomfortable ones, we can strengthen our ethical standing and produce knowledge that can inform critical action during fieldwork and beyond.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Fieldwork, Ethics, and the Importance of ‘Wide Reflexivity’: Feminist Socio-legal Research in Difficult Sites

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月27日

查看全文
  • Agnieszka Doll

摘要

Feminist research in ‘difficult’ sites where violence regularly occurs is complex and nuanced. Using ethnographic vignettes from my research into the socio-legal organisation of involuntary psychiatric admission in Poland, I discuss the ethical challenges and dilemmas I encountered while witnessing frequent violations of admitted persons’ rights and trying to respond to those situations appropriately. I struggled to uphold my feminist commitment to social justice while navigating these complexities. The concept of wide reflexivity (also called robust reflexivity), can help feminist legal researchers attend to “fragile moments from the field” (Hahn in Atlantis 30:88–99, 2006) and unpack their social organisation. Ultimately, I suggest that by attending to these ‘sticky’ moments and being transparent about our fieldwork decisions and actions, especially the uncomfortable ones, we can strengthen our ethical standing and produce knowledge that can inform critical action during fieldwork and beyond.