Scholarlink

<p>The purpose of this study was to estimate the consensus of Australian Health Professionals and/or Researchers (HP/Rs) and Consumers (patients/family/carers) (Cs) on international genetic testing recommendations. Modified Delphi Panel study with seven domains of interest. Fifty-five statements were devised for an online survey administered in REDCap. HP/Rs and Cs were recruited from professional networks and associations for participation in the study. Statements were rated using a Likert scale and analysed using descriptive statistics. Free text comments were allowed within each domain and analysed using thematic analysis. Thirty-six HP/Rs and 27 Cs participated. There was consensus on testing men with a family history of a high-risk hereditary gene; men with PCa and a family history of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) syndrome or Lynch syndrome; and men with metastatic PCa. There was consensus on testing&#xa0;<i>BRCA2, BRCA1</i> and <i>DNA MMR</i>&#xa0;genes for men with metastatic PCa. Thematic analysis of HP/R comments revealed three main topics: the lack of information to make a decision, insufficient knowledge of genetic testing, and capacity to provide genetic testing and counselling. This is the first Australian study on genetic testing recommendations&#xa0;in PCa to inform who should be tested and how. Our study showed apparent deficits in knowledge and implementation, exacerbated by workforce issues around the provision of genetic counselling and testing. Future work should focus on evaluating these recommendations for implementation in Australian practice.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Delphi panel consensus on genetic testing for prostate cancer in Australia: Whom to test and how?

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月24日

查看全文
  • Kim Edmunds,
  • Shiksha Arora,
  • Sri Teppala,
  • Paul Scuffham,
  • David Fairbairn,
  • Matthew J. Roberts,
  • Lisa Horvath,
  • David P. Smith,
  • Haitham Tuffaha

摘要

The purpose of this study was to estimate the consensus of Australian Health Professionals and/or Researchers (HP/Rs) and Consumers (patients/family/carers) (Cs) on international genetic testing recommendations. Modified Delphi Panel study with seven domains of interest. Fifty-five statements were devised for an online survey administered in REDCap. HP/Rs and Cs were recruited from professional networks and associations for participation in the study. Statements were rated using a Likert scale and analysed using descriptive statistics. Free text comments were allowed within each domain and analysed using thematic analysis. Thirty-six HP/Rs and 27 Cs participated. There was consensus on testing men with a family history of a high-risk hereditary gene; men with PCa and a family history of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) syndrome or Lynch syndrome; and men with metastatic PCa. There was consensus on testing BRCA2, BRCA1 and DNA MMR genes for men with metastatic PCa. Thematic analysis of HP/R comments revealed three main topics: the lack of information to make a decision, insufficient knowledge of genetic testing, and capacity to provide genetic testing and counselling. This is the first Australian study on genetic testing recommendations in PCa to inform who should be tested and how. Our study showed apparent deficits in knowledge and implementation, exacerbated by workforce issues around the provision of genetic counselling and testing. Future work should focus on evaluating these recommendations for implementation in Australian practice.