<p>Genetic testing is increasingly recommended for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer; however, no AYA-specific models for cancer risk communication have been developed. We developed a chatbot-based patient- and family-centered cancer risk communication tool, the AYA-RISE (<b>AYA</b>-<b>R</b>isk <b>I</b>nformation and <b>S</b>creening <b>E</b>ducation) intervention for AYAs aged 12–24 years.</p><p>The intervention was developed together with AYAs with cancer risk syndromes, their family members, and clinicians, using Invitae’s Gia<sup>®</sup> chatbot (study Phase 1). 17 AYAs participated in a group discussion and completed surveys for input regarding development. Content was developed for 9 different syndromes. AYA-RISE was then refined after iterative input (Phase 2) and evaluated for feasibility and preliminary outcomes in a pilot study (Phase 3).</p><p>100% of AYAs used the intervention through a point at which risk information was presented via the chatbot and portal demonstrating enrollment and chatbot use feasibility. Our threshold for acceptability was exceeded, with a post-test Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) score of &gt; 4 by 80% of AYAs. In the pre-visit survey, 40% of AYAs correctly reported risk of cancer by age 30, and 20% correctly reported lifetime cancer risk. Following the visit and use of the chat, 60% correctly reported risk of cancer by age 30 and 90% correctly reported lifetime risk. No significant differences in participant pre (3.4) and post (3.6, p=.34) distress thermometer mean scores were observed.</p><p>The AYA-RISE intervention was feasible and acceptable for use by AYAs. Preliminary outcomes included improved knowledge when used in conjunction with a cancer risk clinic visit, without increasing distress. A randomized trial is currently ongoing.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Development and pilot testing of AYA-RISE, a risk information and screening education intervention for adolescents and young adults with cancer risk syndromes

  • Junne Kamihara,
  • Lauren Fisher,
  • Jaclyn Schienda,
  • Rebecca Vanderwall,
  • Moran Snir,
  • Guy Snir,
  • Emilie Simmons,
  • Andrew Khalaj,
  • Evan Goler,
  • Kayla V. Hamilton,
  • Christopher C. Porter,
  • Bojana Pencheva,
  • Joshua D. Schiffman,
  • Luke D. Maese,
  • Wendy Kohlmann,
  • Tara O. Henderson,
  • Judy E. Garber,
  • Lisa R. Diller,
  • Ami V. Desai,
  • Sarah Savage,
  • James L. Klosky,
  • Huma Q. Rana,
  • Jennifer W. Mack

摘要

Genetic testing is increasingly recommended for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer; however, no AYA-specific models for cancer risk communication have been developed. We developed a chatbot-based patient- and family-centered cancer risk communication tool, the AYA-RISE (AYA-Risk Information and Screening Education) intervention for AYAs aged 12–24 years.

The intervention was developed together with AYAs with cancer risk syndromes, their family members, and clinicians, using Invitae’s Gia® chatbot (study Phase 1). 17 AYAs participated in a group discussion and completed surveys for input regarding development. Content was developed for 9 different syndromes. AYA-RISE was then refined after iterative input (Phase 2) and evaluated for feasibility and preliminary outcomes in a pilot study (Phase 3).

100% of AYAs used the intervention through a point at which risk information was presented via the chatbot and portal demonstrating enrollment and chatbot use feasibility. Our threshold for acceptability was exceeded, with a post-test Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) score of > 4 by 80% of AYAs. In the pre-visit survey, 40% of AYAs correctly reported risk of cancer by age 30, and 20% correctly reported lifetime cancer risk. Following the visit and use of the chat, 60% correctly reported risk of cancer by age 30 and 90% correctly reported lifetime risk. No significant differences in participant pre (3.4) and post (3.6, p=.34) distress thermometer mean scores were observed.

The AYA-RISE intervention was feasible and acceptable for use by AYAs. Preliminary outcomes included improved knowledge when used in conjunction with a cancer risk clinic visit, without increasing distress. A randomized trial is currently ongoing.