<p>Recently several philosophers have argued that practical and epistemic reasons for belief can be weighed against each other. Two weighing models have been provided by Andrew Reisner and Christopher Howard. A problem for both models is that they deliver highly implausible verdicts about specific cases. I propose a new model that retains all the advantages of the others but avoids their problems. My model relies on the idea that we almost always have strong practical reasons to hold a doxastic attitude supported by sufficient epistemic reasons. This reason is weighed with other practical reasons to determine which doxastic attitude we should hold all-things-considered.</p>