<p>This study presents a simplified analytical expression to estimate the vertical normal stress <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10665_2025_10475_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="12" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\sigma _z\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <mi>z</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> beneath the center of an elliptically loaded area, derived by extending classical Boussinesq theory. The formulation employs a polar coordinate transformation and a binomial series expansion in terms of eccentricity <i>e</i>, truncated at the sixth-order term. It reduces exactly to the classical circular case when <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10665_2025_10475_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="39" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(e = 0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, ensuring theoretical consistency. Validation against reference solutions shows that the expression maintains high accuracy for eccentricities up to <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10665_2025_10475_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="52" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(e = 0.9\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.9</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and depth ratios up to <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10665_2025_10475_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="56" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(z/b = 2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>z</mi> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mi>b</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, with deviations remaining below 4%. For <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10665_2025_10475_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="76" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(z/b = 2.00\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>z</mi> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mi>b</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.00</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, the sixth-order approximation yields only 3.80% error, while including terms up to <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10665_2025_10475_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="21" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(e^{10}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi>e</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> reduces errors to below 0.5% for <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10665_2025_10475_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="76" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(z/b = 2.55\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>z</mi> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mi>b</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.55</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. A detailed parametric study highlights the nonlinear influence of eccentricity, footing width, and depth on vertical stress behavior. For instance, increasing <i>e</i> from 0.2 to 0.9 increases stress from approximately 43kPa to 59kPa at fixed depth and semi-axis, while stress sharply decreases with increasing depth under constant geometry. The proposed expression offers a computationally efficient and accurate alternative to elliptic-integral-based approaches, with practical relevance in geotechnical and structural engineering applications involving non-circular surface loads.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Analytical expression for vertical stress beneath the center of an elliptically loaded area using Boussinesq theory

  • Sushil Devkota,
  • Ashmit Baral

摘要

This study presents a simplified analytical expression to estimate the vertical normal stress \(\sigma _z\) σ z beneath the center of an elliptically loaded area, derived by extending classical Boussinesq theory. The formulation employs a polar coordinate transformation and a binomial series expansion in terms of eccentricity e, truncated at the sixth-order term. It reduces exactly to the classical circular case when \(e = 0\) e = 0 , ensuring theoretical consistency. Validation against reference solutions shows that the expression maintains high accuracy for eccentricities up to \(e = 0.9\) e = 0.9 and depth ratios up to \(z/b = 2\) z / b = 2 , with deviations remaining below 4%. For \(z/b = 2.00\) z / b = 2.00 , the sixth-order approximation yields only 3.80% error, while including terms up to \(e^{10}\) e 10 reduces errors to below 0.5% for \(z/b = 2.55\) z / b = 2.55 . A detailed parametric study highlights the nonlinear influence of eccentricity, footing width, and depth on vertical stress behavior. For instance, increasing e from 0.2 to 0.9 increases stress from approximately 43kPa to 59kPa at fixed depth and semi-axis, while stress sharply decreases with increasing depth under constant geometry. The proposed expression offers a computationally efficient and accurate alternative to elliptic-integral-based approaches, with practical relevance in geotechnical and structural engineering applications involving non-circular surface loads.