Scholarlink

<p>The efficiency of farmland ecological compensation is a crucial indicator reflecting the effectiveness of input–output implementation in farmland ecological compensation. Investigating the spatial–temporal evolution patterns and driving factors of farmland ecological compensation efficiency holds significant practical value for agricultural ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin. This study employs various methods including the EBM model, GML index, Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition, Markov chain, non-parametric Kernel density estimation, and ArcGIS mapping to measure farmland compensation efficiency, analyze its spatial–temporal evolution patterns, and conduct a driving force analysis using a two-way fixed effects model. Results: (1) Spatial–temporal evolution patterns: Overall, the average farmland ecological compensation efficiency in the Yellow River Basin is relatively low. In terms of temporal trends, the efficiency exhibits a “V”-shaped cyclical fluctuation, gradually rising with a convergence trend. Spatially, farmland ecological compensation efficiency has gone through three stages: low in the center, high in the periphery; high in the center, low in the periphery; and finally, uniform across the entire region. Although cross-level transitions occur, a “leap” transition is difficult to achieve. Regionally, the overall spatial disparity in farmland ecological compensation efficiency in the Yellow River Basin shows a decreasing trend, following an “M”-shaped variation pattern. (2) Driving force analysis: Farmland productivity, agricultural machinery density, and the level of agricultural scale all exhibit positive effects on farmland ecological compensation efficiency, while the level of government agricultural support the degree of agricultural marketization, urbanization, and industrialization all have negative effects. It is necessary to allocate resources efficiently by region, promote coordinated regional development, empower high-quality agriculture through science and technology, innovate agricultural development models, foster government-business collaboration, and diversify strategies to enhance farmland ecological compensation efficiency.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Space and temporal evolution and driving force analysis of ecological compensation efficiency in cultivated land——take the nine provinces in the Yellow River Basin as an example

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月13日

查看全文
  • Na Sun,
  • Xuandeng Xue

摘要

The efficiency of farmland ecological compensation is a crucial indicator reflecting the effectiveness of input–output implementation in farmland ecological compensation. Investigating the spatial–temporal evolution patterns and driving factors of farmland ecological compensation efficiency holds significant practical value for agricultural ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin. This study employs various methods including the EBM model, GML index, Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition, Markov chain, non-parametric Kernel density estimation, and ArcGIS mapping to measure farmland compensation efficiency, analyze its spatial–temporal evolution patterns, and conduct a driving force analysis using a two-way fixed effects model. Results: (1) Spatial–temporal evolution patterns: Overall, the average farmland ecological compensation efficiency in the Yellow River Basin is relatively low. In terms of temporal trends, the efficiency exhibits a “V”-shaped cyclical fluctuation, gradually rising with a convergence trend. Spatially, farmland ecological compensation efficiency has gone through three stages: low in the center, high in the periphery; high in the center, low in the periphery; and finally, uniform across the entire region. Although cross-level transitions occur, a “leap” transition is difficult to achieve. Regionally, the overall spatial disparity in farmland ecological compensation efficiency in the Yellow River Basin shows a decreasing trend, following an “M”-shaped variation pattern. (2) Driving force analysis: Farmland productivity, agricultural machinery density, and the level of agricultural scale all exhibit positive effects on farmland ecological compensation efficiency, while the level of government agricultural support the degree of agricultural marketization, urbanization, and industrialization all have negative effects. It is necessary to allocate resources efficiently by region, promote coordinated regional development, empower high-quality agriculture through science and technology, innovate agricultural development models, foster government-business collaboration, and diversify strategies to enhance farmland ecological compensation efficiency.