<p>Following Hill and Leblond, the aim of our work is to show, for isotropic nonlinear elasticity, a relation between the corotational Zaremba–Jaumann objective derivative of the Cauchy stress <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10659_2024_10097_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>σ</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\sigma $</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, i.e. <Equation ID="Equa"> <MediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10659_2024_10097_Article_Equa.gif" Format="GIF" Height="40" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="381" /> </MediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mfrac> <msup> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <mo>ZJ</mo> </msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </mfrac> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>σ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </mfrac> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>σ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mi>W</mi> <mspace width="0.2em" /> <mi>σ</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi>σ</mi> <mspace width="0.2em" /> <mi>W</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="2em" /> <mi>W</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mtext>skew</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mi>F</mi> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> <mspace width="0.2em" /> <msup> <mi>F</mi> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX"> \(\begin{aligned} \frac{\mathrm {D}^{\operatorname{ZJ}}}{ \mathrm {D}t}[\sigma ] = \frac{\mathrm {D}}{\mathrm {D}t}[\sigma ] - W \, \sigma + \sigma \, W, \qquad W = \mbox{skew}(\dot{F} \, F^{-1}) \end{aligned}\) </EquationSource> </Equation> and a constitutive requirement involving the logarithmic strain tensor. Given the deformation tensor <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10659_2024_10097_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="62" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>F</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <mi>φ</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$F = \mathrm {D}\varphi $</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, the left Cauchy-Green tensor <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10659_2024_10097_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="76" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>B</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>F</mi> <mspace width="0.2em" /> <msup> <mi>F</mi> <mi>T</mi> </msup> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$B = F \, F^{T}$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and the strain-rate tensor <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10659_2024_10097_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="22" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="123" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>D</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo>sym</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mi>F</mi> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> <mspace width="0.2em" /> <msup> <mi>F</mi> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$D = \operatorname{sym}(\dot{F} \, F^{-1})$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, we show that <Equation ID="Equ1"> <EquationNumber>1</EquationNumber> <MediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10659_2024_10097_Article_Equ1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="93" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="427" /> </MediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mtable columnalign="right left" columnspacing="0.2em"> <mtr> <mtd /> <mtd> <mi mathvariant="normal">∀</mi> <mspace width="0.2em" /> <mi>D</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mo>Sym</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>3</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>∖</mo> <mo stretchy="false">{</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo stretchy="false">}</mo> <mo>:</mo> <mspace width="0.3em" /> <mrow> <mo>〈</mo> <mfrac> <msup> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <mo>ZJ</mo> </msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </mfrac> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>σ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> <mo>,</mo> <mi>D</mi> <mo>〉</mo> </mrow> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd /> <mtd> <mspace width="1em" /> <mo stretchy="false">⇔</mo> <mspace width="1em" /> <mo>log</mo> <mi>B</mi> <mo>↦</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mi>σ</mi> <mo>ˆ</mo> </mover> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mo>log</mo> <mi>B</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mspace width="0.25em" /> <mtext>is strongly Hilbert-monotone</mtext> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd /> <mtd> <mspace width="1em" /> <mo stretchy="false">⇔</mo> <mspace width="1em" /> <mo>sym</mo> <msub> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <mrow> <mo>log</mo> <mi>B</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>σ</mi> <mo>ˆ</mo> </mover> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mo>log</mo> <mi>B</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>∈</mo> <msubsup> <mo>Sym</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mrow> <mo>+</mo> <mo>+</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>6</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mspace width="1em" /> <mtext mathvariant="normal">(TSTS-M</mtext> <mmultiscripts> <mtext>)</mtext> <mprescripts /> <none /> <mrow> <mo>+</mo> <mo>+</mo> </mrow> </mmultiscripts> <mo>,</mo> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX"> \(\begin{aligned} &amp; \forall \,D\in \operatorname{Sym}(3) \! \setminus \! \{0\}: ~ \left \langle \frac{\mathrm {D}^{\operatorname{ZJ}}}{ \mathrm {D}t}[\sigma ],D\right \rangle &gt; 0 \\ &amp; \quad \iff \quad \log B \longmapsto \widehat{\sigma}(\log B) \; \textrm{is strongly Hilbert-monotone} \\ &amp;\quad \iff \quad \operatorname{sym} \mathrm {D}_{\log B} \widehat{\sigma}(\log B) \in \operatorname{Sym}^{++}_{4}(6) \quad \text{(TSTS-M$^{++}$)}, \end{aligned}\) </EquationSource> </Equation> where <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10659_2024_10097_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="71" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mo>Sym</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mrow> <mo>+</mo> <mo>+</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>6</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\operatorname{Sym}^{++}_{4}(6)$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> denotes the set of positive definite, (minor and major) symmetric fourth order tensors. We call the first inequality of (<InternalRef RefID="Equ1">1</InternalRef>) “corotational stability postulate” (CSP), a novel concept, which implies the <b>T</b>rue-<b>S</b>tress <b>T</b>rue-<b>S</b>train strict Hilbert-<b>M</b>onotonicity (TSTS-M<sup>+</sup>) for <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10659_2024_10097_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="159" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>B</mi> <mo>↦</mo> <mi>σ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>B</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mi>σ</mi> <mo>ˆ</mo> </mover> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mo>log</mo> <mi>B</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$B \mapsto \sigma (B) = \widehat{\sigma}(\log B)$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, i.e. <Equation ID="Equb"> <MediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10659_2024_10097_Article_Equb.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="514" /> </MediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>〈</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mi>σ</mi> <mo>ˆ</mo> </mover> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mo>log</mo> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mi>σ</mi> <mo>ˆ</mo> </mover> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mo>log</mo> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>,</mo> <mo>log</mo> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>−</mo> <mo>log</mo> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>〉</mo> </mrow> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mspace width="2em" /> <mi mathvariant="normal">∀</mi> <mspace width="0.2em" /> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>≠</mo> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>∈</mo> <msup> <mo>Sym</mo> <mrow> <mo>+</mo> <mo>+</mo> </mrow> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>3</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mspace width="0.2em" /> <mo>.</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( \left \langle \widehat{\sigma}(\log B_{1})-\widehat{\sigma}(\log B_{2}), \log B_{1}-\log B_{2}\right \rangle &gt; 0 \qquad \forall \, B_{1}\neq B_{2} \in \operatorname{Sym}^{++}(3) \, . \)</EquationSource> </Equation> A similar result, but for the Kirchhoff stress <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10659_2024_10097_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="58" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>τ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>J</mi> <mspace width="0.2em" /> <mi>σ</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\tau = J \, \sigma $</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> has been shown by Hill as early as 1968. Leblond translated this idea to the Cauchy stress <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10659_2024_10097_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>σ</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\sigma $</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> but only for the hyperelastic case. In this paper we expand on the ideas of Hill and Leblond, extending Leblond calculus to the Cauchy elastic case.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Constitutive Condition for Idealized Isotropic Cauchy Elasticity Involving the Logarithmic Strain

  • Marco Valerio d’Agostino,
  • Sebastian Holthausen,
  • Davide Bernardini,
  • Adam Sky,
  • Ionel-Dumitrel Ghiba,
  • Robert J. Martin,
  • Patrizio Neff

摘要

Following Hill and Leblond, the aim of our work is to show, for isotropic nonlinear elasticity, a relation between the corotational Zaremba–Jaumann objective derivative of the Cauchy stress σ $\sigma $ , i.e. D ZJ D t [ σ ] = D D t [ σ ] W σ + σ W , W = skew ( F ˙ F 1 ) \(\begin{aligned} \frac{\mathrm {D}^{\operatorname{ZJ}}}{ \mathrm {D}t}[\sigma ] = \frac{\mathrm {D}}{\mathrm {D}t}[\sigma ] - W \, \sigma + \sigma \, W, \qquad W = \mbox{skew}(\dot{F} \, F^{-1}) \end{aligned}\) and a constitutive requirement involving the logarithmic strain tensor. Given the deformation tensor F = D φ $F = \mathrm {D}\varphi $ , the left Cauchy-Green tensor B = F F T $B = F \, F^{T}$ , and the strain-rate tensor D = sym ( F ˙ F 1 ) $D = \operatorname{sym}(\dot{F} \, F^{-1})$ , we show that 1 D Sym ( 3 ) { 0 } : D ZJ D t [ σ ] , D > 0 log B σ ˆ ( log B ) is strongly Hilbert-monotone sym D log B σ ˆ ( log B ) Sym 4 + + ( 6 ) (TSTS-M ) + + , \(\begin{aligned} & \forall \,D\in \operatorname{Sym}(3) \! \setminus \! \{0\}: ~ \left \langle \frac{\mathrm {D}^{\operatorname{ZJ}}}{ \mathrm {D}t}[\sigma ],D\right \rangle > 0 \\ & \quad \iff \quad \log B \longmapsto \widehat{\sigma}(\log B) \; \textrm{is strongly Hilbert-monotone} \\ &\quad \iff \quad \operatorname{sym} \mathrm {D}_{\log B} \widehat{\sigma}(\log B) \in \operatorname{Sym}^{++}_{4}(6) \quad \text{(TSTS-M$^{++}$)}, \end{aligned}\) where Sym 4 + + ( 6 ) $\operatorname{Sym}^{++}_{4}(6)$ denotes the set of positive definite, (minor and major) symmetric fourth order tensors. We call the first inequality of (1) “corotational stability postulate” (CSP), a novel concept, which implies the True-Stress True-Strain strict Hilbert-Monotonicity (TSTS-M+) for B σ ( B ) = σ ˆ ( log B ) $B \mapsto \sigma (B) = \widehat{\sigma}(\log B)$ , i.e. σ ˆ ( log B 1 ) σ ˆ ( log B 2 ) , log B 1 log B 2 > 0 B 1 B 2 Sym + + ( 3 ) . \( \left \langle \widehat{\sigma}(\log B_{1})-\widehat{\sigma}(\log B_{2}), \log B_{1}-\log B_{2}\right \rangle > 0 \qquad \forall \, B_{1}\neq B_{2} \in \operatorname{Sym}^{++}(3) \, . \) A similar result, but for the Kirchhoff stress τ = J σ $\tau = J \, \sigma $ has been shown by Hill as early as 1968. Leblond translated this idea to the Cauchy stress σ $\sigma $ but only for the hyperelastic case. In this paper we expand on the ideas of Hill and Leblond, extending Leblond calculus to the Cauchy elastic case.