Scholarlink

<p>It is usually stated that property rights security on assets positively affects investment incentives since it guarantees the ability to get the future benefits from investments. Yet, the empirical evidence on this relationship is ambiguous. From a theoretical point of view, this is not surprising since property rights security on asset may even entail a negative effect on investment incentives as long as property rights are endogenous to investments (Besley, Journal of Political Economy 103:903–937, 1995) or investors are characterized by time-inconsistent preferences (Vertova, Review of Socio-Economic Perspectives 5:61–75, 2020). Instead, from a theoretical point of view, a clear-cut negative relationship exists between property rigths security on unused assets (the expected ability to invest on a unsued asset) and investment incentives. In this paper I test this theoretical prediction using a difference-in-difference matching method on Brazilian municipal data. I find that land occupations by Landless Workers’Movement (as a proxy for property rights insecurity on unused assets) positively affect the degree of land use (as a proxy for investment) in Brazilian municipalities.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Property rights on unused assets and investment incentives: evidence from Brazil

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月1日

查看全文
  • Pietro Vertova

摘要

It is usually stated that property rights security on assets positively affects investment incentives since it guarantees the ability to get the future benefits from investments. Yet, the empirical evidence on this relationship is ambiguous. From a theoretical point of view, this is not surprising since property rights security on asset may even entail a negative effect on investment incentives as long as property rights are endogenous to investments (Besley, Journal of Political Economy 103:903–937, 1995) or investors are characterized by time-inconsistent preferences (Vertova, Review of Socio-Economic Perspectives 5:61–75, 2020). Instead, from a theoretical point of view, a clear-cut negative relationship exists between property rigths security on unused assets (the expected ability to invest on a unsued asset) and investment incentives. In this paper I test this theoretical prediction using a difference-in-difference matching method on Brazilian municipal data. I find that land occupations by Landless Workers’Movement (as a proxy for property rights insecurity on unused assets) positively affect the degree of land use (as a proxy for investment) in Brazilian municipalities.