<p>This study provides a comprehensive analysis of vocational education digitalization policies across China, Australia, Japan, Germany, and the UK. It utilizes a multi-dimensional framework to assess policy subjects, themes and instruments. The findings highlight multi-stakeholder involvement and varying national approaches. A collective commitment to enhancing digital skills and aligning vocational education with industry requirements is evident, though specific priorities vary by country. There is a significant focus on supply-side policy instruments often at the expense of demand-side considerations. Common challenges include digital infrastructure disparity and the complexity of stakeholder collaboration. To address these, the study recommends enhancing collaboration mechanisms among diverse subjects, improving resource allocation, and balancing market-driven and government-led initiatives. Further, it suggests optimizing policy content, and enhancing policy instrument synergy and alignment with national and international contexts.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

How do nations around the world navigate the digitalization of vocational education policies?

  • Junfeng Diao,
  • Xiaoqi Tang,
  • Xu Ding

摘要

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of vocational education digitalization policies across China, Australia, Japan, Germany, and the UK. It utilizes a multi-dimensional framework to assess policy subjects, themes and instruments. The findings highlight multi-stakeholder involvement and varying national approaches. A collective commitment to enhancing digital skills and aligning vocational education with industry requirements is evident, though specific priorities vary by country. There is a significant focus on supply-side policy instruments often at the expense of demand-side considerations. Common challenges include digital infrastructure disparity and the complexity of stakeholder collaboration. To address these, the study recommends enhancing collaboration mechanisms among diverse subjects, improving resource allocation, and balancing market-driven and government-led initiatives. Further, it suggests optimizing policy content, and enhancing policy instrument synergy and alignment with national and international contexts.