Background <p>This study focuses on rare immune-mediated psoriasis induced by anti-PD-L1 drugs. Given that its clinical features have not been fully defined, the aim is to clarify the clinical manifestations, treatment, and outcomes of anti-PD-L1-induced psoriasis.</p> Methods <p>We performed a retrospective analysis of psoriasis cases induced by anti-PD-L1 agents. The study involved systematically retrieving case reports from relevant databases up to April 23, 2025, for comprehensive evaluation.</p> Results <p>This study included 31 patients, with 90.2% being male and a median age of 65&#xa0;years (40–81&#xa0;years). The anti-PD-L1 agents administered to patients included atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab. Notably, 16 patients (51.6%) developed de novo psoriasis. The median time to psoriasis onset after drug initiation was 54.5&#xa0;days (7–690&#xa0;days), with plaque psoriasis being the most common clinical type (54.8%). In terms of treatment strategies, 19 patients (61.3%) discontinued anti-PD-L1 therapy, while 8 patients (25.8%) continued treatment. Following clinical interventions, including primarily the administration of topical steroids, symptomatic improvement or complete remission was reported in 25 patients (80.6%).</p> Conclusion <p>When administering anti-PD-L1 agents, close monitoring for the onset of psoriatic symptoms in patients is essential to ensure timely detection and diagnosis. For patients who have been diagnosed with psoriasis, appropriate measures should be taken based on their specific clinical conditions, such as discontinuing anti-PD-L1 therapy or administering psoriasis treatment medications.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Clinical features, treatment, and outcomes of anti-PD-L1 induced psoriasis

  • Jian Xiao,
  • Zhi Xia,
  • Zhu Wu,
  • Min Fang

摘要

Background

This study focuses on rare immune-mediated psoriasis induced by anti-PD-L1 drugs. Given that its clinical features have not been fully defined, the aim is to clarify the clinical manifestations, treatment, and outcomes of anti-PD-L1-induced psoriasis.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of psoriasis cases induced by anti-PD-L1 agents. The study involved systematically retrieving case reports from relevant databases up to April 23, 2025, for comprehensive evaluation.

Results

This study included 31 patients, with 90.2% being male and a median age of 65 years (40–81 years). The anti-PD-L1 agents administered to patients included atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab. Notably, 16 patients (51.6%) developed de novo psoriasis. The median time to psoriasis onset after drug initiation was 54.5 days (7–690 days), with plaque psoriasis being the most common clinical type (54.8%). In terms of treatment strategies, 19 patients (61.3%) discontinued anti-PD-L1 therapy, while 8 patients (25.8%) continued treatment. Following clinical interventions, including primarily the administration of topical steroids, symptomatic improvement or complete remission was reported in 25 patients (80.6%).

Conclusion

When administering anti-PD-L1 agents, close monitoring for the onset of psoriatic symptoms in patients is essential to ensure timely detection and diagnosis. For patients who have been diagnosed with psoriasis, appropriate measures should be taken based on their specific clinical conditions, such as discontinuing anti-PD-L1 therapy or administering psoriasis treatment medications.