Scholarlink

<p>Despite the significant gastrointestinal (GI) disease burden in rural America, prior research has highlighted persistent disparities in access to care for GI diseases for patients in non-metropolitan regions. In the study by Cwalina et al. [5], the authors analyze gastroenterologist data from the Physician Compare Database collected from 2014 to 2025, finding that while the absolute number of rural gastroenterologists increased, the proportion practicing rurally remained stable at approximately 7.7%. Late career stage and the Midwest region were associated with increased odds of rural practice, whereas female sex, hepatology subspecialization, academic affiliation, and both small and large practice sizes were associated with decreased odds. These findings reveal a workforce that has grown numerically, but has not kept sufficient pace with the access needs of rural patients, thereby highlighting two intersecting vulnerabilities: an aging rural GI workforce and a rising proportion of women in gastroenterology who face structural barriers to rural practice. This commentary contextualizes these findings, calling for proactive, patient-centered strategies to sustain rural gastroenterology care.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A Workforce at a Crossroads: Rural Gastroenterology Supply in the United States

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月6日

查看全文
  • I. Midura,
  • L. G. Rabinowitz

摘要

Despite the significant gastrointestinal (GI) disease burden in rural America, prior research has highlighted persistent disparities in access to care for GI diseases for patients in non-metropolitan regions. In the study by Cwalina et al. [5], the authors analyze gastroenterologist data from the Physician Compare Database collected from 2014 to 2025, finding that while the absolute number of rural gastroenterologists increased, the proportion practicing rurally remained stable at approximately 7.7%. Late career stage and the Midwest region were associated with increased odds of rural practice, whereas female sex, hepatology subspecialization, academic affiliation, and both small and large practice sizes were associated with decreased odds. These findings reveal a workforce that has grown numerically, but has not kept sufficient pace with the access needs of rural patients, thereby highlighting two intersecting vulnerabilities: an aging rural GI workforce and a rising proportion of women in gastroenterology who face structural barriers to rural practice. This commentary contextualizes these findings, calling for proactive, patient-centered strategies to sustain rural gastroenterology care.