Scholarlink

<p>The new definition of steatotic liver disease (SLD), as a broader concept, was a step forward in the increasing recognition of the substantial overlap between alcohol and cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs), in a continuum way. The spectrum of pathophysiological aspects, ranging from liver steatosis to fibrosis, has similarities in MASLD and ALD. Also, there is now considerable evidence that the association of metabolic dysfunction with increased alcohol consumption impacts on the risk of severe liver disease and prognosis. The new MetALD class, as recently proposed, shows clear differences in prognosis when comparing with MASLD and ALD groups. However, there is room for improvement, such as considering the role of previous alcohol intake, fluctuations of consumption over time, including binge drinking, refinement of alcohol assessment, and better understanding of the role of biomarkers. In summary, SLD is no doubt a significant improvement, but the new classification needs to be dynamic and adapting to patients needing frequent reassessment. Furthermore, it brings opportunities for research on the interaction between alcohol consumption and CMRFs.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Role of Alcohol in Steatotic Liver Disease: Impact on Patients with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月1日

查看全文
  • Francisco Capinha,
  • Sofia Carvalhana,
  • Helena Cortez-Pinto

摘要

The new definition of steatotic liver disease (SLD), as a broader concept, was a step forward in the increasing recognition of the substantial overlap between alcohol and cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs), in a continuum way. The spectrum of pathophysiological aspects, ranging from liver steatosis to fibrosis, has similarities in MASLD and ALD. Also, there is now considerable evidence that the association of metabolic dysfunction with increased alcohol consumption impacts on the risk of severe liver disease and prognosis. The new MetALD class, as recently proposed, shows clear differences in prognosis when comparing with MASLD and ALD groups. However, there is room for improvement, such as considering the role of previous alcohol intake, fluctuations of consumption over time, including binge drinking, refinement of alcohol assessment, and better understanding of the role of biomarkers. In summary, SLD is no doubt a significant improvement, but the new classification needs to be dynamic and adapting to patients needing frequent reassessment. Furthermore, it brings opportunities for research on the interaction between alcohol consumption and CMRFs.