错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Linked Color Imaging with Light-Emitting Diode Light Enhances the Visibility of Gastric Neoplasm: A Prospective, Multicenter, Comparative Trial

  • Naoto Iwai,
  • Osamu Dohi,
  • Takahiro Kotachi,
  • Momoko Tsuda,
  • Nobuaki Yagi,
  • Shoko Ono,
  • Mayuko Seya,
  • Hajime Teshima,
  • Kimitoshi Kubo,
  • Yuki Nakahata,
  • Akihiro Obora,
  • Shiro Oka,
  • Shinji Tanaka,
  • Yoshito Itoh,
  • Mototsugu Kato

摘要

Background

Early detection of gastric cancer can play a key role in improving prognosis. Recently, light-emitting diodes (LED) have been developed as novel endoscopic systems. However, the differences in the visibility of gastric neoplastic lesions between LED and laser endoscopy remains unclear. We conducted a prospective multicenter trial to evaluate the non-inferiority of LED endoscopy in the visibility of gastric neoplastic lesions undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in comparison to laser endoscopy.

Methods

A multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted in patients undergoing ESD for gastric neoplastic lesions at five hospitals throughout Japan. Seventy patients with 74 lesions were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the non-inferiority of the difference in the individual scores of linked color imaging (LCI) and white-light imaging (WLI) for LED and laser endoscopy for gastric neoplastic lesions.

Results

The mean individual score was 2.66 ± 1.02, 3.17 ± 0.83, 2.75 ± 1.05, and 3.21 ± 0.84 in LED-WLI, LED-LCI, laser-WLI, and laser-LCI, respectively. The difference in individual scores of LCI and WLI was 0.51 ± 0.77 and 0.46 ± 0.80 in LED and laser endoscopy, respectively. The mean difference between LED and laser endoscopy was 0.04 (95% confidence interval [CI]: − 0.05 to 0.13, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

This study revealed the non-inferiority of the differences in individual scores between LCI and WLI in the comparison of LED and laser endoscopy for gastric neoplastic lesions.