Scholarlink

<p>Treatment completion in interventions within correctional settings is challenging both generally and for people with mental illness (MI). Few studies have explored treatment completion alongside feedback from this population.&#xa0;We examined the rates of treatment completion alongside participant feedback to explore how participant feedback can improve treatment completion.&#xa0;Mixed-methods were used to examine treatment completion rates and clinical characteristics of participants (<i>n</i> = 24), and to explore participant feedback. We used thematic, qualitative analysis of participant feedback (<i>n</i> = 17) obtained from interviews, alongside univariate statistics to describe the sample of treatment completers and non-completers.&#xa0;Three-quarters of participants completed the treatment. Non-completers had a higher proportion of one or more infractions than completers. Four themes from participant feedback emerged in the qualitative analysis: <i>Practice</i>,<i> Applicable Takeaways</i>,<i> Intervention Pace</i>,<i> and Group Dynamics</i>.&#xa0;Participants’ feedback highlights important considerations for responsive practices to improve treatment completion among incarcerated men with MI.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Exploring Treatment Completion and Participant Feedback in an Adapted Intervention among Incarcerated Men with Mental Illness

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月17日

查看全文
  • Melissa L. Villodas,
  • Jonathan Phillips,
  • Ehren Dohler,
  • Anna Parisi,
  • Faith Scanlon,
  • Chloe Pilkerton,
  • Amy Blank Wilson

摘要

Treatment completion in interventions within correctional settings is challenging both generally and for people with mental illness (MI). Few studies have explored treatment completion alongside feedback from this population. We examined the rates of treatment completion alongside participant feedback to explore how participant feedback can improve treatment completion. Mixed-methods were used to examine treatment completion rates and clinical characteristics of participants (n = 24), and to explore participant feedback. We used thematic, qualitative analysis of participant feedback (n = 17) obtained from interviews, alongside univariate statistics to describe the sample of treatment completers and non-completers. Three-quarters of participants completed the treatment. Non-completers had a higher proportion of one or more infractions than completers. Four themes from participant feedback emerged in the qualitative analysis: Practice, Applicable Takeaways, Intervention Pace, and Group Dynamics. Participants’ feedback highlights important considerations for responsive practices to improve treatment completion among incarcerated men with MI.