<p>We revisit the standard “telescoping sum” argument ubiquitous in the final steps of analyzing evaluation complexity of algorithms for smooth nonconvex optimization, and obtain a refined formulation of the resulting bound as a function of the requested accuracy <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10589_2025_709_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="10" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\epsilon \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. While bounds obtained using the standard argument typically are of the form <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10589_2025_709_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="52" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal{O}(\epsilon ^{-\alpha })\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for some positive <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10589_2025_709_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, the refined results are of the form <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10589_2025_709_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="46" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(o(\epsilon ^{-\alpha })\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We then explore to which known algorithms our refined bounds are applicable and finally describe an example showing how close the standard and refined bounds can be.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Refining asymptotic complexity bounds for nonconvex optimization methods, including why steepest descent is \(o(\epsilon ^{-2})\) rather than \(\mathcal{O}(\epsilon ^{-2})\)

  • S. Gratton,
  • C.-K. Sim,
  • Ph. L. Toint

摘要

We revisit the standard “telescoping sum” argument ubiquitous in the final steps of analyzing evaluation complexity of algorithms for smooth nonconvex optimization, and obtain a refined formulation of the resulting bound as a function of the requested accuracy \(\epsilon \) . While bounds obtained using the standard argument typically are of the form \(\mathcal{O}(\epsilon ^{-\alpha })\) for some positive \(\alpha \) , the refined results are of the form \(o(\epsilon ^{-\alpha })\) . We then explore to which known algorithms our refined bounds are applicable and finally describe an example showing how close the standard and refined bounds can be.