Scholarlink

<p>If climate crisis is a relational crisis, then geoengineering technologies and practices cannot be fully assessed without being understood relationally. This essay explores the relational dimensions and dynamics of responding to climate change with geoengineering in/as multispecies community under colonialism. It begins with two meaningful punctuations before turning to an exploratory case study—the pond on the author’s family farm. Among the messages conveyed are: (1) there are ethical, political, epistemic, and pragmatic reasons for thinking that any decision to enact geoengineering must rely upon multispecies dialogue and justice; (2) a pond is never just a pond.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Which worlds? With whom?: Geoengineering through a relational multispecies lens

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月10日

查看全文
  • Julia D. Gibson

摘要

If climate crisis is a relational crisis, then geoengineering technologies and practices cannot be fully assessed without being understood relationally. This essay explores the relational dimensions and dynamics of responding to climate change with geoengineering in/as multispecies community under colonialism. It begins with two meaningful punctuations before turning to an exploratory case study—the pond on the author’s family farm. Among the messages conveyed are: (1) there are ethical, political, epistemic, and pragmatic reasons for thinking that any decision to enact geoengineering must rely upon multispecies dialogue and justice; (2) a pond is never just a pond.