Scholarlink

<p>This article addresses ethical and political implications of solar geoengineering through the lens of Hannah Arendt’s analysis of contemporary science. Geoengineering, particularly Solar Radiation Management (SRM), is often framed as a continuation of the (Baconian) scientific project of mastering nature through reason. This article examines solar geoengineering’s appeal as a response to climate change precisely <i>because</i> it is seen as calculated human mastery over nature. It challenges this view, however, by drawing on Arendt’s distinction between ‘natural’ and ‘universal’ science, situating solar geoengineering within the latter category. Rather than reinforcing <i>control over</i> nature, solar geoengineering exemplifies a shift towards a ‘universal’ science in which human actions <i>into</i> nature increasingly unchain <i>unpredictable</i> and <i>irreversible</i> natural processes. Moreover, Arendt’s framework shows that these new scientific actions into nature not only undermine the possibility for controlled mastery, but also erode the capacity for deliberate political action. Through this Arendtian reframing of SRM, the article invites new moral and political considerations.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Unchaining the atmosphere: rethinking solar geoengineering with Hannah Arendt

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月8日

查看全文
  • Linde De Vroey

摘要

This article addresses ethical and political implications of solar geoengineering through the lens of Hannah Arendt’s analysis of contemporary science. Geoengineering, particularly Solar Radiation Management (SRM), is often framed as a continuation of the (Baconian) scientific project of mastering nature through reason. This article examines solar geoengineering’s appeal as a response to climate change precisely because it is seen as calculated human mastery over nature. It challenges this view, however, by drawing on Arendt’s distinction between ‘natural’ and ‘universal’ science, situating solar geoengineering within the latter category. Rather than reinforcing control over nature, solar geoengineering exemplifies a shift towards a ‘universal’ science in which human actions into nature increasingly unchain unpredictable and irreversible natural processes. Moreover, Arendt’s framework shows that these new scientific actions into nature not only undermine the possibility for controlled mastery, but also erode the capacity for deliberate political action. Through this Arendtian reframing of SRM, the article invites new moral and political considerations.