Scholarlink

<p>We present an analysis to determine whether historical trends in extreme precipitation and temperature indices, as well as in yearly averages of several climate variables can be associated in part with anthropogenic climate change or explained solely by natural causes. To achieve this, we use three methodologies: a) a climate model-based approach, b) a hybrid method that combines models and observations (1979–2019), and c) a climate observations-based method (1983–2016). For each methodology, we compare the climate change <i>signal</i>, represented by the historical trends, to the <i>noise</i> generated by simulated climate datasets (using models or statistical methods) that do not include human influence. Overall, the model-based method suggests possible detection of the human influence in most temperature extreme indices and in precipitation-related indices in the northern countries. The hybrid method detects human influence in significantly fewer variables, but in many cases, consistently with those of the model-based approach. Both the hybrid and observation-based methods exhibit similar noise variability to the model-based method. Notably, due to limitations in data availability, our analysis excludes the most recent five years, during which substantial warming and an increase of extreme events have been observed globally.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Detection and attribution of trends of meteorological extremes in Central America

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月30日

查看全文
  • H. G. Hidalgo,
  • S. W. Chou-Chen,
  • K. A. McKinnon,
  • S. Pascale,
  • D. Quesada-Chacón,
  • E. J. Alfaro,
  • P. Bautista-Solís,
  • P. M. Pérez-Briceño,
  • H. F. Diaz,
  • T. Maldonado,
  • E. R. Rivera,
  • T. Nakaegawa

摘要

We present an analysis to determine whether historical trends in extreme precipitation and temperature indices, as well as in yearly averages of several climate variables can be associated in part with anthropogenic climate change or explained solely by natural causes. To achieve this, we use three methodologies: a) a climate model-based approach, b) a hybrid method that combines models and observations (1979–2019), and c) a climate observations-based method (1983–2016). For each methodology, we compare the climate change signal, represented by the historical trends, to the noise generated by simulated climate datasets (using models or statistical methods) that do not include human influence. Overall, the model-based method suggests possible detection of the human influence in most temperature extreme indices and in precipitation-related indices in the northern countries. The hybrid method detects human influence in significantly fewer variables, but in many cases, consistently with those of the model-based approach. Both the hybrid and observation-based methods exhibit similar noise variability to the model-based method. Notably, due to limitations in data availability, our analysis excludes the most recent five years, during which substantial warming and an increase of extreme events have been observed globally.