Scholarlink

Purpose <p>Emerging lipid-lowering therapies, such as Plozasiran, target apolipoprotein C-III (APOC-III) by inhibiting its hepatic production at the mRNA level, presenting a novel approach to lipid regulation. However, the safety and efficacy of plozasiran have yet to be fully established.</p> Methods <p>We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL register of trials for studies comparing plozasiran to placebo in patients with dyslipidemic disorders. The primary outcomes were percentage changes from baseline in triglyceride (TG) and APOC-III levels at 24 weeks and the end of the study. Secondary outcomes included changes in other lipid parameters and safety outcomes at 24 weeks and the end of the study. A protocol was registered to PROSPERO under registration number [CRD420251026605].</p> Results <p>Four studies encompassing 1,514 participants were included in our meta-analysis. Plozasiran significantly improved TGs, APOC-III, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) levels at both 24 weeks and study completion. Subgroup analyses based on dose and regimen revealed consistent findings. Quarterly administration of plozasiran at 10&#xa0;mg, 25&#xa0;mg, and 50&#xa0;mg resulted in significant reductions in TGs, APOC-III, non–HDL-C, and HDL-C at both 24 weeks and study completion. For ApoB, all three doses produced significant reductions at 24 weeks; however, only the 25&#xa0;mg and 50&#xa0;mg quarterly regimens sustained these reductions through the end of the study. Regarding safety, patients receiving plozasiran experienced a higher incidence of any adverse events, headache, and mild rises in HbA1C levels. Subgroup analysis revealed a dose-dependent pattern for certain safety outcomes.</p> Conclusion <p>While Plozasiran shows strong potential as a therapeutic option for severe dyslipidemic conditions, further studies are needed to compare its efficacy and safety with currently available treatments and, more importantly, evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes for implementation in clinical practice.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The Efficacy and Safety of Plozasiran on Lipid Profile in Dyslipidemic Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月18日

查看全文
  • Pishoy Sydhom,
  • Bakr Al-Quraishi,
  • Aya Gohar,
  • Mohamad El-Shawaf,
  • Nahla Shehata,
  • Miral Ataya,
  • Mark Sydhom,
  • Nouran Awwad,
  • Haidy Motawade,
  • Nourhan Naji,
  • Mahmoud Shaaban Abdelgalil

摘要

Purpose

Emerging lipid-lowering therapies, such as Plozasiran, target apolipoprotein C-III (APOC-III) by inhibiting its hepatic production at the mRNA level, presenting a novel approach to lipid regulation. However, the safety and efficacy of plozasiran have yet to be fully established.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL register of trials for studies comparing plozasiran to placebo in patients with dyslipidemic disorders. The primary outcomes were percentage changes from baseline in triglyceride (TG) and APOC-III levels at 24 weeks and the end of the study. Secondary outcomes included changes in other lipid parameters and safety outcomes at 24 weeks and the end of the study. A protocol was registered to PROSPERO under registration number [CRD420251026605].

Results

Four studies encompassing 1,514 participants were included in our meta-analysis. Plozasiran significantly improved TGs, APOC-III, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) levels at both 24 weeks and study completion. Subgroup analyses based on dose and regimen revealed consistent findings. Quarterly administration of plozasiran at 10 mg, 25 mg, and 50 mg resulted in significant reductions in TGs, APOC-III, non–HDL-C, and HDL-C at both 24 weeks and study completion. For ApoB, all three doses produced significant reductions at 24 weeks; however, only the 25 mg and 50 mg quarterly regimens sustained these reductions through the end of the study. Regarding safety, patients receiving plozasiran experienced a higher incidence of any adverse events, headache, and mild rises in HbA1C levels. Subgroup analysis revealed a dose-dependent pattern for certain safety outcomes.

Conclusion

While Plozasiran shows strong potential as a therapeutic option for severe dyslipidemic conditions, further studies are needed to compare its efficacy and safety with currently available treatments and, more importantly, evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes for implementation in clinical practice.