Scholarlink

<p>Despite the ethical stance of new energy proponents, solar installations can, like any large-scale investments, be drivers of violent socio-political and socio-economic conflict in fragile contexts. This poses risks both to people and to successful implementation of a green transition. We first review how “green” energy investments can turn “red” through their entanglement in the political economy of conflict. We then empirically analyze the conflict impact of solar projects using a geospatial panel dataset. Employing propensity score panel matching in a subnational research design, we show that commercial-scale solar projects in the 104 countries characterized as fragile contexts at some point between 1994–2020, on average, cause an increase in deaths from conflict in the year following the project start in their local project area. Conflict escalation is driven by sentiment towards elites, underlining the propensity of these projects to undermine social cohesion. Given the ethical deficiency of outcomes that further burden the already poor and vulnerable, these results call for greater accountability for conflict risk assessment and mitigation by green financiers, the companies they fund, green energy advocates, and policy makers, together embedded in a too narrow view of the ethical landscape of the green transition.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

From Green to Red: New Energy Projects and Violent Conflict in Fragile Contexts

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月12日

查看全文
  • Anne Spencer Jamison,
  • Brian Ganson,
  • Witold Jerzy Henisz,
  • Joseph Bettles

摘要

Despite the ethical stance of new energy proponents, solar installations can, like any large-scale investments, be drivers of violent socio-political and socio-economic conflict in fragile contexts. This poses risks both to people and to successful implementation of a green transition. We first review how “green” energy investments can turn “red” through their entanglement in the political economy of conflict. We then empirically analyze the conflict impact of solar projects using a geospatial panel dataset. Employing propensity score panel matching in a subnational research design, we show that commercial-scale solar projects in the 104 countries characterized as fragile contexts at some point between 1994–2020, on average, cause an increase in deaths from conflict in the year following the project start in their local project area. Conflict escalation is driven by sentiment towards elites, underlining the propensity of these projects to undermine social cohesion. Given the ethical deficiency of outcomes that further burden the already poor and vulnerable, these results call for greater accountability for conflict risk assessment and mitigation by green financiers, the companies they fund, green energy advocates, and policy makers, together embedded in a too narrow view of the ethical landscape of the green transition.