Scholarlink

Purpose <p>This study assessed the impact of radiotherapy (RT) techniques on chronic skin reactions and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in breast cancer patients, comparing conventional RT with modern techniques such as intensity-modulated RT (IMRT).</p> Methods <p>A comprehensive search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to April 26, 2024. Conventional RT, which uses 2D or 3D imaging to shape radiation beams without dynamic intensity modulation, was compared with alternate RT techniques for adjuvant breast cancer treatment. Primary outcomes included chronic grade ≥ 2 skin toxicities (hyperpigmentation, breast fibrosis, telangiectasia, edema, and atrophy/retraction) and HRQoL, assessed mainly with EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 modules. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model.</p> Results <p>From 1305 screened studies, nine articles representing seven studies (2418 patients), including three randomized controlled trials, met inclusion criteria. Most studies used conventional fractionation (45–50 Gray in 25 fractions). IMRT was associated with a lower incidence of chronic grade ≥ 2 hyperpigmentation (RR: 0.39, 95%CI: 0.17–0.89, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) compared to conventional RT. No significant differences were found for grade ≥ 2 breast fibrosis, telangiectasia, edema, and atrophy/retraction. Cosmetic outcomes from IMRT were favorable in the short term, with no long-term differences. Three studies reported no significant HRQoL differences between IMRT and conventional RT.</p> Conclusion <p>IMRT may reduce certain&#xa0;chronic skin toxicities compared to conventional RT. However,&#xa0;consistent long-term differences in cosmetic outcomes or HRQoL&#xa0;were not observed. These findings are limited by the small number of studies and variability in reporting standards.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Chronic skin toxicities in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of radiotherapy techniques

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月5日

查看全文
  • Shing Fung Lee,
  • Henry C. Y. Wong,
  • Jolien Robijns,
  • Stephen Lowell B. Ciocon,
  • Paula Elaine Diniz dos Reis,
  • Sarina Sadeghi,
  • Muna Al-Khaifi,
  • Mami Ogita,
  • Adrian W. Chan,
  • Agata Rembielak,
  • Daniel Livesey,
  • Matthew Chong,
  • Zhihui Amy Liu,
  • Mark Trombetta,
  • Wee Yao Koh,
  • Yiat Horng Leong,
  • Gustavo N. Marta,
  • Pierluigi Bonomo,
  • Viola Salvestrini,
  • Vassilios Vassiliou,
  • Pradnya Chopade,
  • Partha Patel,
  • Cindy Wong,
  • Julie Ryan Wolf,
  • Corina van den Hurk,
  • Raymond J. Chan,
  • Michael Jefford,
  • Edward Chow,
  • Jennifer Yin Yee Kwan

摘要

Purpose

This study assessed the impact of radiotherapy (RT) techniques on chronic skin reactions and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in breast cancer patients, comparing conventional RT with modern techniques such as intensity-modulated RT (IMRT).

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to April 26, 2024. Conventional RT, which uses 2D or 3D imaging to shape radiation beams without dynamic intensity modulation, was compared with alternate RT techniques for adjuvant breast cancer treatment. Primary outcomes included chronic grade ≥ 2 skin toxicities (hyperpigmentation, breast fibrosis, telangiectasia, edema, and atrophy/retraction) and HRQoL, assessed mainly with EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 modules. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model.

Results

From 1305 screened studies, nine articles representing seven studies (2418 patients), including three randomized controlled trials, met inclusion criteria. Most studies used conventional fractionation (45–50 Gray in 25 fractions). IMRT was associated with a lower incidence of chronic grade ≥ 2 hyperpigmentation (RR: 0.39, 95%CI: 0.17–0.89, I2 = 0%) compared to conventional RT. No significant differences were found for grade ≥ 2 breast fibrosis, telangiectasia, edema, and atrophy/retraction. Cosmetic outcomes from IMRT were favorable in the short term, with no long-term differences. Three studies reported no significant HRQoL differences between IMRT and conventional RT.

Conclusion

IMRT may reduce certain chronic skin toxicities compared to conventional RT. However, consistent long-term differences in cosmetic outcomes or HRQoL were not observed. These findings are limited by the small number of studies and variability in reporting standards.