错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Genomic and transcriptomic landscape of HER2-low breast cancer

  • Rani Bansal,
  • Tolulope Adeyelu,
  • Andrew Elliott,
  • Phillip Walker,
  • Matias A. Bustos,
  • Estelamari Rodriguez,
  • Melissa K. Accordino,
  • Jane Meisel,
  • Margaret E. Gatti-Mays,
  • Emily Hsu,
  • Kate Lathrop,
  • Virginia Kaklamani,
  • Matthew Oberley,
  • George Sledge,
  • Sarah L. Sammons,
  • Stephanie L. Graff

摘要

Background

Novel agents have expanded the traditional HER2 definitions to include HER2-Low (HER2L) Breast Cancer (BC). We sought to evaluate the distinct molecular characteristics of HER2L BC to understand potential clinical/biologic factors driving resistance and clinical outcomes.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed on 13,613 BC samples, tested at Caris Life Sciences via NextGen DNA/RNA Sequencing. BC subtypes were defined by IHC/ISH. CODEai database was used to access clinical outcomes from insurance claims data.

Results

Overall, mutational landscape was similar between HER2L and classical subsets of HR+and HRneg cohorts. TP53 mutations were significantly higher in HRneg/HER2L group vs. HR+/HER2L tumors (p<0.001). A higher mutation rate of PIK3CA was observed in HRneg/HER2L tumors compared to TNBC subtype (p=0.016). PD-L1 positivity was elevated in HRneg/HER2L tumors compared to HR+/HER2L tumors, all p<0.01. Patients with HR+/HER2L tumors treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors had similar OS compared to pts with HR+/HER2-0 (HR=0.89, p=0.012). 27.2% of HR+/HER2L pts had activating PIK3CA mutations. Among HR+PIK3CA mutated tumors, HER2L pts treated with alpelisib showed no difference in OS vs. HER2-0 alpelisib-treated pts (HR=1.23, p=0.517). 13.9% of HER2L TNBC pts were PD-L1+. Interestingly, pts with PD-L1+ HER2L/HRneg (TNBC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) showed improved OS than HER2-0 TNBC (HR=0.61, p=0.046).

Conclusion

Our findings expand the understanding of the molecular profile of the HER2L subgroup and comparison to the classically defined breast cancer subgroups. Genomic risk assessments after progression on novel therapeutics can be assessed to better define implications for mechanisms of resistance.