错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The COVID-19 pandemic and its effects on follow-up of patients with early breast cancer: A patient survey

  • Ana-Alicia Beltran-Bless,
  • Gail Larocque,
  • Muriel Brackstone,
  • Angel Arnaout,
  • Jean-Michel Caudrelier,
  • Denise Boone,
  • Parvaneh Fallah,
  • Terry Ng,
  • Peter Cross,
  • Nasser Alqahtani,
  • John Hilton,
  • Lisa Vandermeer,
  • Gregory Pond,
  • Mark Clemons

摘要

Purpose

Despite limited evidence supporting its effectiveness, most guidelines recommend long-term, routinely scheduled in-person surveillance of patients with early breast cancer (EBC). The COVID-19 pandemic led to increased use of virtual care. This survey evaluated patient perspectives on follow-up care.

Methods

Patients with EBC undergoing surveillance were surveyed about follow-up protocols, perceptions, and interest in clinical trials assessing different follow-up strategies.

Results

Of 402 approached patients 270 completed the survey (response rate 67%). Median age 62.5 years (range 25–86) and median time since breast cancer diagnosis was 3.8 years (range < 1–33 years). Most (n = 148/244, 60%) were followed by more than one provider. Routine follow-ups with breast examination were mostly conducted by medical/radiation oncologists every 6 months (n = 110/236, 46%) or annually (n = 106/236, 44%). Participants felt routine follow-up was useful to monitor for recurrence, manage side effects of cancer treatment and to provide support/reassurance. Most participants felt regular follow-up care would detect recurrent cancer earlier (n = 214/255, 96%) and increase survival (n = 218/249, 88%). The COVID-19 pandemic reduced the number of in-person visits for 54% of patients (n = 63/117). Patients were concerned this reduction of in-person visits would lead to later detection of both local (n = 29/63, 46%) and distant recurrences (n = 25/63, 40%). While many felt their medical and radiation oncologists were the most suited to provide follow-up care, 55% felt comfortable having their primary care provider (PCP) conduct surveillance. When presented with a scenario where follow-up has no effect on earlier detection or survival, 70% of patients still wanted routine in-person follow-up for reassurance (63%) with the goal of earlier recurrence detection (56%).

Conclusions

Despite limited evidence of effectiveness of routine in-person assessment, patients continue to place importance on regularly scheduled in-person follow-up.