<p>Recently, a novel class of modified gravity theories has been proposed, wherein Einstein’s General Relativity (GR) is extended by incorporating a quadratic energy–momentum term of the form <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4501_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="52" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>ν</mi> </mrow> </msub> <msup> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>ν</mi> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$T_{\mu \nu }T^{\mu \nu } $</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, coupled via a constant parameter <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4501_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>α</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\alpha $</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The corresponding field equations deviate from the Einstein equations only in the presence of matter. Analytical studies indicate that, without interaction, the energy-momentum squared term remains subdominant, mainly enabling non-singular Big Bang scenarios. In this work, we investigate this framework in a homogeneous and isotropic cosmological background. We show that, in its minimal form, the theory does not naturally explain late-time cosmic acceleration. Although a cosmological constant can remedy this, it introduces an effective dark energy component with positive pressure during the matter era, distorting large-scale structure formation. To overcome this, we derive an analytical dark energy form by redefining its equation of state and imposing boundary conditions consistent with early- and late-time cosmology. The resulting phenomenological model alleviates the coincidence and fine-tuning problems and ensures classical stability. Observational constraints confirm good agreement with current data, though a statefinder analysis shows that, while the model mimics <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4501_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\Lambda $</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>CDM today, it deviates in the far future as the acceleration rate increases.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Analytical approach to dark energy in energy-momentum squared gravity

  • H. R. Fazlollahi,
  • H. Velten,
  • A. V. Gomez Lopez

摘要

Recently, a novel class of modified gravity theories has been proposed, wherein Einstein’s General Relativity (GR) is extended by incorporating a quadratic energy–momentum term of the form T μ ν T μ ν $T_{\mu \nu }T^{\mu \nu } $ , coupled via a constant parameter α $\alpha $ . The corresponding field equations deviate from the Einstein equations only in the presence of matter. Analytical studies indicate that, without interaction, the energy-momentum squared term remains subdominant, mainly enabling non-singular Big Bang scenarios. In this work, we investigate this framework in a homogeneous and isotropic cosmological background. We show that, in its minimal form, the theory does not naturally explain late-time cosmic acceleration. Although a cosmological constant can remedy this, it introduces an effective dark energy component with positive pressure during the matter era, distorting large-scale structure formation. To overcome this, we derive an analytical dark energy form by redefining its equation of state and imposing boundary conditions consistent with early- and late-time cosmology. The resulting phenomenological model alleviates the coincidence and fine-tuning problems and ensures classical stability. Observational constraints confirm good agreement with current data, though a statefinder analysis shows that, while the model mimics Λ $\Lambda $ CDM today, it deviates in the far future as the acceleration rate increases.