<p>We present a theoretical analysis of the <sup>3</sup>He(<InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4476_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>α</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\alpha $</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4476_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="12" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\gamma $</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>)<sup>7</sup>Be radiative capture reaction, using pionless effective field theory (EFT) at the leading order. What sets our approach apart is the unique combination of direct capture mechanisms and resonant processes that involve the <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4476_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="37" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mn>7</mn> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mo>−</mo> </msup> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$7/2^{-}$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> excited state of <sup>7</sup>Be at 429&#xa0;keV. By rigorously examining electromagnetic multipole transitions, we’ve managed to achieve a theoretical uncertainty of just 4.1% for the astrophysical S-factor. Our calculated value of <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4476_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="187" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>S</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.511</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>0.021</mn> <mtext>&#xa0;keV</mtext> <mo>⋅</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$S(0) = 0.511 \pm 0.021\text{ keV}\cdot $</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>b aligns impressively with the recommended experimental value of <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4476_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="15" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="133" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mn>0.529</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>0.018</mn> <mtext>&#xa0;keV</mtext> <mo>⋅</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$0.529 \pm 0.018\text{ keV}\cdot $</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>b. At the temperatures found in the solar core (<InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4476_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="76" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.015</mn> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$T_{9} = 0.015$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), our reaction rate of <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4476_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="21" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="226" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>9.2</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>0.4</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>×</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msup> <msup> <mtext>&#xa0;cm</mtext> <mn>3</mn> </msup> <msup> <mtext>&#xa0;mol</mtext> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <msup> <mtext>&#xa0;s</mtext> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$(9.2 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{3}\text{ cm}^{3}\text{ mol}^{-1}\text{ s}^{-1}$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> helps to clear up some long-standing discrepancies in stellar models. Interestingly, our multipole decomposition shows a surprising persistence of M1 contributions (35.2% at resonance) that goes beyond what typical single-particle models would predict, underscoring the significance of two-body currents. The theoretical uncertainties we encountered are mainly due to EFT truncation errors (2.8%) and variations in low-energy constants (2.1%). These findings have direct implications for solar neutrino flux predictions and calculations of primordial lithium abundance.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The 3He(\(\alpha \), \(\gamma \))7Be reaction in effective field theory

  • Hossein Sadeghi,
  • Maryam Khoddam

摘要

We present a theoretical analysis of the 3He( α $\alpha $ , γ $\gamma $ )7Be radiative capture reaction, using pionless effective field theory (EFT) at the leading order. What sets our approach apart is the unique combination of direct capture mechanisms and resonant processes that involve the 7 / 2 $7/2^{-}$ excited state of 7Be at 429 keV. By rigorously examining electromagnetic multipole transitions, we’ve managed to achieve a theoretical uncertainty of just 4.1% for the astrophysical S-factor. Our calculated value of S ( 0 ) = 0.511 ± 0.021  keV $S(0) = 0.511 \pm 0.021\text{ keV}\cdot $ b aligns impressively with the recommended experimental value of 0.529 ± 0.018  keV $0.529 \pm 0.018\text{ keV}\cdot $ b. At the temperatures found in the solar core ( T 9 = 0.015 $T_{9} = 0.015$ ), our reaction rate of ( 9.2 ± 0.4 ) × 10 3  cm 3  mol 1  s 1 $(9.2 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{3}\text{ cm}^{3}\text{ mol}^{-1}\text{ s}^{-1}$ helps to clear up some long-standing discrepancies in stellar models. Interestingly, our multipole decomposition shows a surprising persistence of M1 contributions (35.2% at resonance) that goes beyond what typical single-particle models would predict, underscoring the significance of two-body currents. The theoretical uncertainties we encountered are mainly due to EFT truncation errors (2.8%) and variations in low-energy constants (2.1%). These findings have direct implications for solar neutrino flux predictions and calculations of primordial lithium abundance.