<p>Double Neutron Stars (DNSs) are unique probes to study various aspects of modern astrophysics. Recent discoveries have confirmed direct connections between DNSs and supernova explosions. This provides valuable information about the evolutionary history of these systems, especially regarding whether the second-born Neutron Star (NS) originated from either a Core-Collapse (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4433_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="30" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>C</mi> <mi>C</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$CC$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) or Electron-Capture Supernovae (<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4433_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>E</mi> <mi>C</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mi>e</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$ECSNe$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) event. The provided scale diagram illustrates the distribution of different types of DNSs on the basis of their orbital parameters and other factors, including mass loss. As a result, the physical processes in DNSs vary depending on the formation mechanisms of the second-born NS and characteristics of the systems. <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4433_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>E</mi> <mi>C</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mi>e</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$ECSNe$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> processes are typically associated with merging systems (<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4433_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="109" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>e</mi> <mo>×</mo> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mrow> <mi>o</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$e\times {P_{orb}}&lt; 0.05$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), while <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4433_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="30" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>C</mi> <mi>C</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$CC$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> processes are more commonly linked to non-merging systems (<InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4433_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="109" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>e</mi> <mo>×</mo> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mrow> <mi>o</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$e\times {P_{orb}}&gt; 0.05$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>). Our results suggest a critical mass threshold of 1.30<InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4433_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="105" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mo>⊙</mo> </msub> <mo>±</mo> <mn>0.22</mn> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mo>⊙</mo> </msub> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$M_{\odot } \pm 0.22M_{\odot } $</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (critical value) for the <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4433_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>E</mi> <mi>C</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mi>e</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$ECSNe$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> process to form an NS, while <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4433_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="30" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>C</mi> <mi>C</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$CC$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> processes might occur at higher masses. Examining the orbital parameters of DNSs in a known gravitational potential can enhance our understanding of the theoretical predictions for DNS progenitor characteristics. It turns out that the <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4433_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>E</mi> <mi>C</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mi>e</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$ECSNe$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> process predominantly produces DNS systems with short orbital (<InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4433_Article_IEq11.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="92" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mrow> <mi>o</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>≤</mo> <mn>0.25</mn> <mi>d</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$P_{orb} \leq 0.25 d$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), nearly circular orbits (<InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10509_2025_4433_Article_IEq12.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="53" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>e</mi> <mo>≃</mo> <mn>0.2</mn> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$e\simeq 0.2$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), accompanied by minimal kick velocities imparted on the proto-NS and significant mass loss. In contrast, their orbital dynamics in a known gravitational potential plays a crucial role in enhancing our understanding of the SNe geometry and the formation and evolution processes among different NS samples.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Exploring the formation mechanisms of double neutron star systems: an analytical perspective

  • Ali Taani,
  • Mohammed Abu-Saleem,
  • Mohammad Mardini,
  • Hussam Aljboor,
  • Mohammad Tayem

摘要

Double Neutron Stars (DNSs) are unique probes to study various aspects of modern astrophysics. Recent discoveries have confirmed direct connections between DNSs and supernova explosions. This provides valuable information about the evolutionary history of these systems, especially regarding whether the second-born Neutron Star (NS) originated from either a Core-Collapse ( C C $CC$ ) or Electron-Capture Supernovae ( E C S N e $ECSNe$ ) event. The provided scale diagram illustrates the distribution of different types of DNSs on the basis of their orbital parameters and other factors, including mass loss. As a result, the physical processes in DNSs vary depending on the formation mechanisms of the second-born NS and characteristics of the systems. E C S N e $ECSNe$ processes are typically associated with merging systems ( e × P o r b < 0.05 $e\times {P_{orb}}< 0.05$ ), while C C $CC$ processes are more commonly linked to non-merging systems ( e × P o r b > 0.05 $e\times {P_{orb}}> 0.05$ ). Our results suggest a critical mass threshold of 1.30 M ± 0.22 M $M_{\odot } \pm 0.22M_{\odot } $ (critical value) for the E C S N e $ECSNe$ process to form an NS, while C C $CC$ processes might occur at higher masses. Examining the orbital parameters of DNSs in a known gravitational potential can enhance our understanding of the theoretical predictions for DNS progenitor characteristics. It turns out that the E C S N e $ECSNe$ process predominantly produces DNS systems with short orbital ( P o r b 0.25 d $P_{orb} \leq 0.25 d$ ), nearly circular orbits ( e 0.2 $e\simeq 0.2$ ), accompanied by minimal kick velocities imparted on the proto-NS and significant mass loss. In contrast, their orbital dynamics in a known gravitational potential plays a crucial role in enhancing our understanding of the SNe geometry and the formation and evolution processes among different NS samples.