Scholarlink

<p>Increasing numbers of young men and women report celibacy or infrequent sex. In the present work, we consider “choosiness” as a potential correlate of partnered sexual activity for single people. We examined the tendency to be “choosy” in selecting a partner (i.e., choosiness) in two ways: choosiness based in reported essential characteristics in a partner (stated choosiness) and revealed by ratings of dating profiles (revealed choosiness). Results from a survey of 340 single, heterosexual, American participants (aged 18–40&#xa0;years, 170 female) showed that choosiness relates to sexual frequency, but it depended on how it was measured. Stated choosiness was associated with more partnered sexual activity, whereas revealed choosiness was associated with engaging in less partnered sexual activity. These relationships remained significant even when controlling for pre-established correlates of sexual frequency, such as gender and self-rated attractiveness. This research provides a starting point for understanding choosiness and its role in single heterosexual adults’ sexual experience.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Choosiness as a Predictor of Sexual (In)frequency in Single Heterosexual Adults

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月4日

查看全文
  • Henry S. G. Close,
  • Lewis Nitschinsk,
  • Brendan P. Zietsch,
  • Fiona Kate Barlow

摘要

Increasing numbers of young men and women report celibacy or infrequent sex. In the present work, we consider “choosiness” as a potential correlate of partnered sexual activity for single people. We examined the tendency to be “choosy” in selecting a partner (i.e., choosiness) in two ways: choosiness based in reported essential characteristics in a partner (stated choosiness) and revealed by ratings of dating profiles (revealed choosiness). Results from a survey of 340 single, heterosexual, American participants (aged 18–40 years, 170 female) showed that choosiness relates to sexual frequency, but it depended on how it was measured. Stated choosiness was associated with more partnered sexual activity, whereas revealed choosiness was associated with engaging in less partnered sexual activity. These relationships remained significant even when controlling for pre-established correlates of sexual frequency, such as gender and self-rated attractiveness. This research provides a starting point for understanding choosiness and its role in single heterosexual adults’ sexual experience.