<p>Regenerative therapeutic effect of bioactive fish by-products (gelatin and fish mucin) and botanical (shea butter) on wound healing of <i>Clarias gariepinus</i> was studied. Thirty-five fish of 312 ± 14&#xa0;g average weight were divided into seven groups, each comprising a fish and its four replicates: the gelatin group, mucin group, shea butter group, gelatin-shea butter homogenate group, mucin-shea butter homogenate group, positive control and negative control group Wound incision was made on each fish, then monitored for contraction rates, visual closure, and histological changes over 18&#xa0;days. Result obtained were subjected to appropriate statistical analysis using SPSS 16.0. It was observed that penicillin ointment produced the fastest and most complete healing (&gt; 60% closure), gelatin-based treatments (gelatin alone and gelatin + shea butter) closely matched penicillin’s performance, achieving near-comparable closure rates. Shea butter, mucin, and mucin–shea butter homogenate produced intermediate healing (50–55% closure) while the untreated group showed the slowest healing, underscoring the importance of active intervention. Histological analysis revealed penicillin-treated wounds with dense mononuclear infiltration, gelatin-treated wounds with moderate inflammation, shea butter-treated wounds with complete epidermal integrity, and mucin-treated wounds with minimal inflammation. The order of preference for the wound healing materials include: penicillin ointment<b> &gt; </b>gelatin &gt; gelatin-shea butter homogenate &gt; shea butter &gt; mucin-shea butter homogenate &gt; mucin. Among the natural wound-healing materials, gelatin consistently produced the most favorable results, closely matching the healing efficiency of penicillin ointment. Therefore, gelatin-based treatments should be prioritized to replace synthetic wound-healing materials in aquaculture, offering a sustainable, eco-friendly, and effective solution for fish health management.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Regenerative therapeutic effect of bioactive fish by-products (gelatin and fish mucin) and botanical (shea butter) on wound healing of Clarias gareipinus

  • Ahmed Ayodeji Ayeloja,
  • Adeyemi Wasiu Jimoh,
  • Aliyu Safiya Ismaila,
  • Opeyemi Sheriffdeen Ajibola

摘要

Regenerative therapeutic effect of bioactive fish by-products (gelatin and fish mucin) and botanical (shea butter) on wound healing of Clarias gariepinus was studied. Thirty-five fish of 312 ± 14 g average weight were divided into seven groups, each comprising a fish and its four replicates: the gelatin group, mucin group, shea butter group, gelatin-shea butter homogenate group, mucin-shea butter homogenate group, positive control and negative control group Wound incision was made on each fish, then monitored for contraction rates, visual closure, and histological changes over 18 days. Result obtained were subjected to appropriate statistical analysis using SPSS 16.0. It was observed that penicillin ointment produced the fastest and most complete healing (> 60% closure), gelatin-based treatments (gelatin alone and gelatin + shea butter) closely matched penicillin’s performance, achieving near-comparable closure rates. Shea butter, mucin, and mucin–shea butter homogenate produced intermediate healing (50–55% closure) while the untreated group showed the slowest healing, underscoring the importance of active intervention. Histological analysis revealed penicillin-treated wounds with dense mononuclear infiltration, gelatin-treated wounds with moderate inflammation, shea butter-treated wounds with complete epidermal integrity, and mucin-treated wounds with minimal inflammation. The order of preference for the wound healing materials include: penicillin ointment > gelatin > gelatin-shea butter homogenate > shea butter > mucin-shea butter homogenate > mucin. Among the natural wound-healing materials, gelatin consistently produced the most favorable results, closely matching the healing efficiency of penicillin ointment. Therefore, gelatin-based treatments should be prioritized to replace synthetic wound-healing materials in aquaculture, offering a sustainable, eco-friendly, and effective solution for fish health management.