Scholarlink

<p>In this work, direct numerical simulations are used to investigate which physical effects of active flow control are most relevant for improving the aerodynamic performance of airfoils. To this end, two active flow control strategies based on inherently different physical mechanisms are systematically compared on the upper surface of the supercritical V2C airfoil in compressible transonic flow. The first strategy consists of streamwise-travelling waves of spanwise wall velocity (StTW), a skin-friction drag reduction technique that locally decreases wall shear stress in the region of application. The second strategy is uniform wall-normal suction, which locally increases skin-friction drag. One strength of the present study is that the control configurations are evaluated at matched lift coefficients to isolate the impact of the control mechanisms on drag components, boundary-layer development, shock position, and energetic cost. Despite their opposite local effects on skin-friction drag, both control strategies yield comparable and significant improvements in global aerodynamic efficiency. The analysis reveals that, for both approaches, the dominant mechanism responsible for the efficiency increase is a downstream displacement of the shock, accompanied by a reduction in boundary-layer momentum thickness. These results highlight the central role of shock–boundary-layer interaction control in enhancing transonic aerodynamic performance and demonstrate that skin-friction drag reduction alone is not a sufficient metric for assessing the effectiveness of active flow control strategies.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparison between Localized Skin-Friction Reduction and Suction on a Supercritical Airfoil

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月11日

查看全文
  • Annika Frede,
  • Giulio Soldati,
  • Sergio Pirozzoli,
  • Niccolò Berizzi,
  • Maurizio Quadrio,
  • Davide Gatti

摘要

In this work, direct numerical simulations are used to investigate which physical effects of active flow control are most relevant for improving the aerodynamic performance of airfoils. To this end, two active flow control strategies based on inherently different physical mechanisms are systematically compared on the upper surface of the supercritical V2C airfoil in compressible transonic flow. The first strategy consists of streamwise-travelling waves of spanwise wall velocity (StTW), a skin-friction drag reduction technique that locally decreases wall shear stress in the region of application. The second strategy is uniform wall-normal suction, which locally increases skin-friction drag. One strength of the present study is that the control configurations are evaluated at matched lift coefficients to isolate the impact of the control mechanisms on drag components, boundary-layer development, shock position, and energetic cost. Despite their opposite local effects on skin-friction drag, both control strategies yield comparable and significant improvements in global aerodynamic efficiency. The analysis reveals that, for both approaches, the dominant mechanism responsible for the efficiency increase is a downstream displacement of the shock, accompanied by a reduction in boundary-layer momentum thickness. These results highlight the central role of shock–boundary-layer interaction control in enhancing transonic aerodynamic performance and demonstrate that skin-friction drag reduction alone is not a sufficient metric for assessing the effectiveness of active flow control strategies.