<p>Turbulent open channel flow is known to feature a multi-layer structure near the free surface. In the present work we employ direct numerical simulations considering Reynolds numbers up to <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10494_2025_665_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="90" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\boldsymbol{R{e_\tau } = 900}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and domain sizes large enough (<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10494_2025_665_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="95" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\boldsymbol{{L_x} = 12\pi h}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10494_2025_665_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="85" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\boldsymbol{{L_z} = 4\pi h}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) to faithfully capture the effect of very-large-scale motions in order to test the proposed scaling laws and ultimately answer the question: How far does the influence of the free surface extend? In the region near the free surface, where fluctuation intensities of velocity and vorticity become highly anisotropic, we observe the previously documented triple-layer structure, consisting of a wall-normal velocity damping layer that scales with the channel height <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10494_2025_665_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(h\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and two sublayers that scale with the near-surface viscous length scale <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10494_2025_665_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="25" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="118" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\boldsymbol{{\ell _{\boldsymbol{V}}} = {\boldsymbol{Re}}_{\boldsymbol{b}}^{ - 1/2}h}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and with the Kolmogorov length scale <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10494_2025_665_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="25" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="120" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\boldsymbol{{\ell _{\boldsymbol{K}}} = {\boldsymbol{Re}}_{\boldsymbol{b}}^{ - 3/4}h}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, respectively. The scaling laws previously proposed by Calmet and Magnaudet [J. Fluid. Mech. <b>474</b>, 355–378 (<CitationRef CitationID="CR8">2003</CitationRef>)] are found to hold with the following exceptions. The thin layer, where the intensity of surface-parallel components of the vorticity rapidly decreases to zero, is here found to scale with the Kolmogorov length scale <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10494_2025_665_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="24" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\boldsymbol{{\ell _{\boldsymbol{K}}}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> rather than with the near-surface viscous scale <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10494_2025_665_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="20" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\boldsymbol{{\ell _{\boldsymbol{V}}}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. In addition, we argue that the Kolmogorov length scale is the relevant scale for the mean velocity gradient near the free surface. Both the mean velocity gradient and the fluctuation intensity of the surface-parallel component of vorticity decay to zero in the Kolmogorov sublayer <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10494_2025_665_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="91" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\boldsymbol{{\delta _{\boldsymbol{K}}} \approx 20{\ell _{\boldsymbol{K}}}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. On the other hand, the layer, where the wall-normal turbulence intensity decreases linearly to zero near the free surface, scales with <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10494_2025_665_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="20" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\boldsymbol{{\ell _{\boldsymbol{V}}}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> rather than <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10494_2025_665_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="24" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\boldsymbol{{\ell _{\boldsymbol{K}}}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> as suggested by Calmet and Magnaudet. The corresponding near-surface viscous sublayer measures <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10494_2025_665_Article_IEq12.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="67" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\boldsymbol{{\delta _{\boldsymbol{V}}} \approx {\ell _{\boldsymbol{V}}}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Importantly, the streamwise turbulence intensity profile for <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10494_2025_665_Article_IEq13.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="90" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\boldsymbol{{\boldsymbol{R}}{{\boldsymbol{e}}_\tau } \geq 400}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> suggests that the influence of the free-slip boundary penetrates essentially all the way down to the solid wall through the appearance of enhanced very-large-scale motions (<InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10494_2025_665_Article_IEq14.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="77" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\boldsymbol{{\delta _{{\boldsymbol{SIL}}}} \approx h}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>). In contrast, the layer where the surface-normal turbulence intensity is damped to zero is restricted to the free surface (<InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10494_2025_665_Article_IEq15.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="112" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\boldsymbol{{\delta _{{\boldsymbol{NVD}}}} \approx 0.3h}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>). As a consequence, the partitioning of the surface-influenced region has to be expanded to a four-layer structure that spans the entire channel height <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10494_2025_665_Article_IEq16.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="16" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\boldsymbol{h}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

How Far Does the Influence of the Free Surface Extend in Turbulent Open Channel Flow?

  • Christian Bauer,
  • Yoshiyuki Sakai,
  • Markus Uhlmann

摘要

Turbulent open channel flow is known to feature a multi-layer structure near the free surface. In the present work we employ direct numerical simulations considering Reynolds numbers up to \(\boldsymbol{R{e_\tau } = 900}\) and domain sizes large enough ( \(\boldsymbol{{L_x} = 12\pi h}\) , \(\boldsymbol{{L_z} = 4\pi h}\) ) to faithfully capture the effect of very-large-scale motions in order to test the proposed scaling laws and ultimately answer the question: How far does the influence of the free surface extend? In the region near the free surface, where fluctuation intensities of velocity and vorticity become highly anisotropic, we observe the previously documented triple-layer structure, consisting of a wall-normal velocity damping layer that scales with the channel height \(h\) , and two sublayers that scale with the near-surface viscous length scale \(\boldsymbol{{\ell _{\boldsymbol{V}}} = {\boldsymbol{Re}}_{\boldsymbol{b}}^{ - 1/2}h}\) and with the Kolmogorov length scale \(\boldsymbol{{\ell _{\boldsymbol{K}}} = {\boldsymbol{Re}}_{\boldsymbol{b}}^{ - 3/4}h}\) , respectively. The scaling laws previously proposed by Calmet and Magnaudet [J. Fluid. Mech. 474, 355–378 (2003)] are found to hold with the following exceptions. The thin layer, where the intensity of surface-parallel components of the vorticity rapidly decreases to zero, is here found to scale with the Kolmogorov length scale \(\boldsymbol{{\ell _{\boldsymbol{K}}}}\) rather than with the near-surface viscous scale \(\boldsymbol{{\ell _{\boldsymbol{V}}}}\) . In addition, we argue that the Kolmogorov length scale is the relevant scale for the mean velocity gradient near the free surface. Both the mean velocity gradient and the fluctuation intensity of the surface-parallel component of vorticity decay to zero in the Kolmogorov sublayer \(\boldsymbol{{\delta _{\boldsymbol{K}}} \approx 20{\ell _{\boldsymbol{K}}}}\) . On the other hand, the layer, where the wall-normal turbulence intensity decreases linearly to zero near the free surface, scales with \(\boldsymbol{{\ell _{\boldsymbol{V}}}}\) rather than \(\boldsymbol{{\ell _{\boldsymbol{K}}}}\) as suggested by Calmet and Magnaudet. The corresponding near-surface viscous sublayer measures \(\boldsymbol{{\delta _{\boldsymbol{V}}} \approx {\ell _{\boldsymbol{V}}}}\) . Importantly, the streamwise turbulence intensity profile for \(\boldsymbol{{\boldsymbol{R}}{{\boldsymbol{e}}_\tau } \geq 400}\) suggests that the influence of the free-slip boundary penetrates essentially all the way down to the solid wall through the appearance of enhanced very-large-scale motions ( \(\boldsymbol{{\delta _{{\boldsymbol{SIL}}}} \approx h}\) ). In contrast, the layer where the surface-normal turbulence intensity is damped to zero is restricted to the free surface ( \(\boldsymbol{{\delta _{{\boldsymbol{NVD}}}} \approx 0.3h}\) ). As a consequence, the partitioning of the surface-influenced region has to be expanded to a four-layer structure that spans the entire channel height \(\boldsymbol{h}\) .