<p>Silverman showed that, assuming the <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(abc\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">abc</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> conjecture, there are <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\gg} \log x\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>≫</mo> <mo>log</mo> <mi>x</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> non-Wieferich primes base <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( a\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>a</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> less than <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(x\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>x</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> [14], for all non-zero <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(a\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>a</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. This inspired Graves and Murty [8], Chen and Ding [1,2], and then Ding [4] to find growth results,assuming the <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(abc\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">abc</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> conjecture, for non-Wieferich primes <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>p</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> base <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( a\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>a</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, where <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p \equiv 1 \pmod{k}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>≡</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mspace width="4.44443pt" /> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mo>mod</mo> <mspace width="0.277778em" /> <mi>k</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for integers <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(k \geq 2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. In light of Murty, Srinivas, and Subramani's recent work on 'the Wieferich primes conjecture'and Euclidean algorithms in number fields [12], number theorists need results on non-Wieferich places in number fields.We prove analogues of the results of Graves and Murty and Ding, and show Ding's result holds for all bases <InlineEquation ID="IEq61"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(a\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>a</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in all imaginary quadratic fields' rings of integers, with 31 explicitly listed exceptions.</p><p>Along the way, we generalize useful results on rational integers to algebraic integers.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The \(abc\) conjecture implies infinitely many non-Wieferich places for fixed bases in number field

  • H. Graves,
  • B. Weiss

摘要

Silverman showed that, assuming the \(abc\) abc conjecture, there are \({\gg} \log x\) log x non-Wieferich primes base \( a\) a less than \(x\) x [14], for all non-zero \(a\) a . This inspired Graves and Murty [8], Chen and Ding [1,2], and then Ding [4] to find growth results,assuming the \(abc\) abc conjecture, for non-Wieferich primes \(p\) p base \( a\) a , where \(p \equiv 1 \pmod{k}\) p 1 ( mod k ) for integers \(k \geq 2\) k 2 . In light of Murty, Srinivas, and Subramani's recent work on 'the Wieferich primes conjecture'and Euclidean algorithms in number fields [12], number theorists need results on non-Wieferich places in number fields.We prove analogues of the results of Graves and Murty and Ding, and show Ding's result holds for all bases \(a\) a in all imaginary quadratic fields' rings of integers, with 31 explicitly listed exceptions.

Along the way, we generalize useful results on rational integers to algebraic integers.