<p>In this paper, we investigate the following elliptic system with Sobolev critical growth</p><p><Equation ID="Equa"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\begin{cases}-\Delta u_1 = G_1(|y|) u_1^{2^*-1} + \frac{1}{2} u_1^{\frac{2^*}{2}-1} u_2^{\frac{2^*}{2}}, &amp; y \in \mathbb{R}^N, \\-\Delta u_2 = G_2(|y|) u_2^{2^*-1} + \frac{1}{2} u_2^{\frac{2^*}{2}-1} u_1^{\frac{2^*}{2}}, &amp; y \in \mathbb{R}^N, \\u_1, u_2 &gt; 0, \quad u_1, u_2 \in D^{1,2}(\mathbb{R}^N),\end{cases}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mo>{</mo> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd> <mo>−</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <msub> <mi>u</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mi>G</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mi>y</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <msubsup> <mi>u</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mrow> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mo>∗</mo> </msup> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>+</mo> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> <msubsup> <mi>u</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mrow> <mfrac> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mo>∗</mo> </msup> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msubsup> <msubsup> <mi>u</mi> <mn>2</mn> <mrow> <mfrac> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mo>∗</mo> </msup> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>,</mo> </mtd> <mtd> <mi>y</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>N</mi> </msup> <mo>,</mo> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mo>−</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <msub> <mi>u</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mi>G</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mi>y</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <msubsup> <mi>u</mi> <mn>2</mn> <mrow> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mo>∗</mo> </msup> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>+</mo> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> <msubsup> <mi>u</mi> <mn>2</mn> <mrow> <mfrac> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mo>∗</mo> </msup> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msubsup> <msubsup> <mi>u</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mrow> <mfrac> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mo>∗</mo> </msup> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>,</mo> </mtd> <mtd> <mi>y</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>N</mi> </msup> <mo>,</mo> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <msub> <mi>u</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>u</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="1em" /> <msub> <mi>u</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>u</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>∈</mo> <msup> <mi>D</mi> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>N</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>,</mo> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> <mo fence="true" stretchy="true" /> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation></p><p>where <i>N</i> ≥ 5, <i>G</i><sub>1</sub> (<i>r</i>) and <i>G</i><sub>2</sub>(<i>r</i>) are positive radial potentials, <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(2^*=\frac{2N}{N-2}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mo>∗</mo> </msup> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </mfrac> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We construct an unbounded sequence of non-radial positive vector solutions of synchronized type via Lyapunov-Schmidt reduction argument. Different from the single equation, it is worth noting that when <i>N</i> ≥ 5, the coupling exponent <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\frac{2^*}{2}-1=\frac2{N-2}&lt;1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mfrac> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mo>∗</mo> </msup> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac> <mn>2</mn> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </mfrac> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>1</mn> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, which poses a serious obstacle to applying the perturbation argument directly. This constitutes the main difficulty of this paper and reflects the significant differences between the coupled system and a single equation. As a matter of fact, it is necessary to give an accurate point-wise estimate of the error term so that it can be absolutely controlled by less than one multiple of the approximate solution. To this end, we improve the decaying order of the error term iteratively, and it should be an effective way to deal with the ill coupled terms.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Non-radial solutions for critical nonlinear elliptic systems in ℝN with higher dimensions N ≥ 5

  • Qing Guo,
  • Chunhua Wang,
  • Qingfang Wang

摘要

In this paper, we investigate the following elliptic system with Sobolev critical growth

\(\begin{cases}-\Delta u_1 = G_1(|y|) u_1^{2^*-1} + \frac{1}{2} u_1^{\frac{2^*}{2}-1} u_2^{\frac{2^*}{2}}, & y \in \mathbb{R}^N, \\-\Delta u_2 = G_2(|y|) u_2^{2^*-1} + \frac{1}{2} u_2^{\frac{2^*}{2}-1} u_1^{\frac{2^*}{2}}, & y \in \mathbb{R}^N, \\u_1, u_2 > 0, \quad u_1, u_2 \in D^{1,2}(\mathbb{R}^N),\end{cases}\) { Δ u 1 = G 1 ( | y | ) u 1 2 1 + 1 2 u 1 2 2 1 u 2 2 2 , y R N , Δ u 2 = G 2 ( | y | ) u 2 2 1 + 1 2 u 2 2 2 1 u 1 2 2 , y R N , u 1 , u 2 > 0 , u 1 , u 2 D 1 , 2 ( R N ) ,

where N ≥ 5, G1 (r) and G2(r) are positive radial potentials, \(2^*=\frac{2N}{N-2}\) 2 = 2 N N 2 . We construct an unbounded sequence of non-radial positive vector solutions of synchronized type via Lyapunov-Schmidt reduction argument. Different from the single equation, it is worth noting that when N ≥ 5, the coupling exponent \(\frac{2^*}{2}-1=\frac2{N-2}<1\) 2 2 1 = 2 N 2 < 1 , which poses a serious obstacle to applying the perturbation argument directly. This constitutes the main difficulty of this paper and reflects the significant differences between the coupled system and a single equation. As a matter of fact, it is necessary to give an accurate point-wise estimate of the error term so that it can be absolutely controlled by less than one multiple of the approximate solution. To this end, we improve the decaying order of the error term iteratively, and it should be an effective way to deal with the ill coupled terms.