<p>The aim of this note is to clarify the relationship between Green’s formula and the associativity of multiplication for derived Hall algebra in the sense of Toën (Duke Math J 135(3):587-615, <CitationRef CitationID="CR25">2006</CitationRef>), Xiao and Xu (Duke Math J 143(2):357-373, <CitationRef CitationID="CR28">2008</CitationRef>) and Xu and Chen (Algebr Represent Theory 16(3):673-687, <CitationRef CitationID="CR30">2013</CitationRef>). Let <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10468_2025_10335_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {A}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="script">A</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> be a finitary hereditary abelian category. It is known that the associativity of the derived Hall algebra <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10468_2025_10335_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="61" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {D}\mathcal {H}_t(\mathcal {A})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">D</mi> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">H</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">A</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> implies Green’s formula. We introduce a new algebra <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10468_2025_10335_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="44" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathcal {L}}_t({\mathcal {A}})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">L</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">A</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> whose associativity is deduced from Green’s formula, and show that it is isomorphic to the derived Hall algebra <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10468_2025_10335_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="61" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {D}\mathcal {H}_t(\mathcal {A})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">D</mi> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">H</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">A</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

From Green’s Formula to Derived Hall Algebras

  • Ji Lin

摘要

The aim of this note is to clarify the relationship between Green’s formula and the associativity of multiplication for derived Hall algebra in the sense of Toën (Duke Math J 135(3):587-615, 2006), Xiao and Xu (Duke Math J 143(2):357-373, 2008) and Xu and Chen (Algebr Represent Theory 16(3):673-687, 2013). Let \(\mathcal {A}\) A be a finitary hereditary abelian category. It is known that the associativity of the derived Hall algebra \(\mathcal {D}\mathcal {H}_t(\mathcal {A})\) D H t ( A ) implies Green’s formula. We introduce a new algebra \({\mathcal {L}}_t({\mathcal {A}})\) L t ( A ) whose associativity is deduced from Green’s formula, and show that it is isomorphic to the derived Hall algebra \(\mathcal {D}\mathcal {H}_t(\mathcal {A})\) D H t ( A ) .