<p>Understanding how farmers adopt conservation farming practices is critical for advancing agricultural sustainability, yet adoption is often treated as a binary outcome. This binary view risks underestimating commitment by mislabeling adaptive management as disadoption, while overestimating environmental benefits by equating small trials with whole-farm adoption. To expand our understanding of adoption, we apply a multidimensional framework – capturing longevity, entirety, variability, and complementarity – to examine how farmers make decisions about cover crops as a focal conservation practice. Drawing on in-depth interviews with 86 farmers across nine U.S. states, we show that adoption is not a linear or uniform process, but a dynamic navigation of trade-offs. Farmers frequently described trialing and partial implementation as strategic resilience mechanisms, discontinuity as a response to shifting constraints rather than failure, and simplification or selective integration of practices as pathways to long-term viability. Complementary practices were often adopted to enhance ecological and economic synergies, reflecting systems-oriented decision-making rather than isolated practice uptake. Our findings advance understanding of adoption by demonstrating that binary adoption metrics fail to capture the lived reality of management. These insights have direct implications for refining cost-share program efficacy, interpreting ecological outcomes, and designing policies that support durable, whole-farm conservation strategies.</p>