Scholarlink

<p>This Questions and Quandaries article focusses on a topic less explored in research conversations, namely that of the tensions that can arise when researchers from distinct professions and disciplines engage in health professions education (HPE) research, each bringing their own set of assumptions and ways of knowing. The article argues that in this potentially conflicting space there are opportunities for productive engagement to improve both the insights and the impact of the academic work being done by HPE scholars within the field.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Making productive use of insider-outsider tensions in HPER

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月26日

查看全文
  • Ayelet Kuper,
  • Patricia O’Sullivan,
  • Susan van Schalkwyk

摘要

This Questions and Quandaries article focusses on a topic less explored in research conversations, namely that of the tensions that can arise when researchers from distinct professions and disciplines engage in health professions education (HPE) research, each bringing their own set of assumptions and ways of knowing. The article argues that in this potentially conflicting space there are opportunities for productive engagement to improve both the insights and the impact of the academic work being done by HPE scholars within the field.