Scholarlink

<p>Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, Queer, Asexual and other minoritized and underrepresented sexual and gender (LGBTIQA+) medical trainees face distinct forms of discrimination that could shape their professional identity formation (PIF). These challenges influence how they engage with the social and cultural dynamics of medical training. While research on PIF is expanding, little is known about how LGBTIQA+ trainees craft their professional identities. Guided by intersectionality theory and employing constructivist grounded theory methodology, we conducted 18 semi-structured interviews with LGBTIQA+ medical students and residents in Bogotá, Colombia. Data were analyzed through constant comparison and iterative coding, with theoretical sampling used to reach theoretical sufficiency. Reflexivity was central, with researchers drawing on their intersectional positionalities to enrich interpretation. LGBTIQA+ medical trainees navigated environments shaped by heteronormativity, where exclusion and violence were commonplace. To safeguard their well-being, they looked for safe spaces within and outside medicine. Experiencing vulnerability in this way deepened their empathy, especially toward marginalized patients. From this arises the figure of the <i>Care Weaver</i>—a physician identity grounded in relational care and committed to challenging detached models of professionalism towards a more humane conscious approach. This study advances PIF understanding by illustrating how LGBTIQA+ trainees actively resist and reconfigure medical norms, transforming marginalization into relational capacities. Their identity work reveals the limitations of existing PIF models and points to the value of integrating intersectionality into both research and educational design. We argue that fostering such identities must not rely on the endurance of systemic harm, but instead on structural reforms that affirm diverse ways of becoming a doctor.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Weaving care from the margins: how LGBTIQA+ medical trainees craft professional identity through vulnerability

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月23日

查看全文
  • Francisco M. Olmos-Vega,
  • Camilo A. Caicedo-Montaño,
  • Juan C. Gelvez-Nieto,
  • Felipe Aluja-Jaramillo

摘要

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, Queer, Asexual and other minoritized and underrepresented sexual and gender (LGBTIQA+) medical trainees face distinct forms of discrimination that could shape their professional identity formation (PIF). These challenges influence how they engage with the social and cultural dynamics of medical training. While research on PIF is expanding, little is known about how LGBTIQA+ trainees craft their professional identities. Guided by intersectionality theory and employing constructivist grounded theory methodology, we conducted 18 semi-structured interviews with LGBTIQA+ medical students and residents in Bogotá, Colombia. Data were analyzed through constant comparison and iterative coding, with theoretical sampling used to reach theoretical sufficiency. Reflexivity was central, with researchers drawing on their intersectional positionalities to enrich interpretation. LGBTIQA+ medical trainees navigated environments shaped by heteronormativity, where exclusion and violence were commonplace. To safeguard their well-being, they looked for safe spaces within and outside medicine. Experiencing vulnerability in this way deepened their empathy, especially toward marginalized patients. From this arises the figure of the Care Weaver—a physician identity grounded in relational care and committed to challenging detached models of professionalism towards a more humane conscious approach. This study advances PIF understanding by illustrating how LGBTIQA+ trainees actively resist and reconfigure medical norms, transforming marginalization into relational capacities. Their identity work reveals the limitations of existing PIF models and points to the value of integrating intersectionality into both research and educational design. We argue that fostering such identities must not rely on the endurance of systemic harm, but instead on structural reforms that affirm diverse ways of becoming a doctor.