Purpose <p>Conventional pulse-contour analysis estimates cardiac output (<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(CO\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">CO</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) from arterial pressure waveforms but often relies on demographic calibration or black-box modeling, which limits physiological interpretability and generalizability. This study aims to develop and validate a structurally identifiable model that simultaneously estimates <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(CO\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">CO</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and vascular parameters from peripheral arterial pressure waveforms.</p> Methods <p>The proposed framework is based on a four-element Windkessel model reformulated through <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>α</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-parameters (<InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\alpha }_{C},{\alpha }_{R},{\alpha }_{L}, {\alpha }_{\tau }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>α</mi> <mi>C</mi> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>α</mi> <mi>R</mi> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>α</mi> <mi>L</mi> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>α</mi> <mi>τ</mi> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) that encapsulate arterial compliance, resistive and inertial loads, and pressure decay dynamics. Radial peripheral arterial pressure (pABP) waveforms are preprocessed, smoothed, converted into a periodic representation, and fitted to the Windkessel model to extract <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>α</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-parameters. Combined with biometric covariates, these parameters serve as inputs to a generalized linear model (Gamma distribution, identity link) trained to estimate <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(CO\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">CO</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The estimated <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(CO\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">CO</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is subsequently reinjected into the <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>α</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-parameter expressions to derive arterial compliance (<InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(C\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>C</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), characteristic impedance (<InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({R}_{z}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mi>z</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), distal resistance (<InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({R}_{dis}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">dis</mi> </mrow> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), and inertance (<InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(L\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>L</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>).</p> Results <p>Internal validation against the EV1000 pulse-contour reference yields an <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({R}^{2}=0.82\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.82</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, negligible bias (− 0.02 <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text{L}.{\text{min}}^{-1}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mtext>L</mtext> <mo>.</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mtext>min</mtext> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), and a percentage error (<InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(PE\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">PE</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) of 26.17%, meeting the clinical interchangeability criterion (<InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(PE\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">PE</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> &lt; 30%). External evaluation on an independent Vigileo dataset achieves <InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({R}^{2}=0.72\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.72</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq19"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(PE\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">PE</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 28.41% without retraining, confirming robustness across platforms.</p> Conclusion <p>The <InlineEquation ID="IEq20"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>α</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-parameterized Windkessel framework provides a physiologically interpretable, data-efficient, and calibration-free alternative for <InlineEquation ID="IEq21"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(CO\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">CO</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> estimation. Beyond <InlineEquation ID="IEq22"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(CO\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">CO</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, it simultaneously quantifies <InlineEquation ID="IEq23"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(C\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>C</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq24"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({R}_{z}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mi>z</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq25"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({R}_{dis}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">dis</mi> </mrow> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and <InlineEquation ID="IEq26"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(L\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>L</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, offering a comprehensive and mechanistically grounded hemodynamic profile from a single peripheral arterial pressure signal, suitable for real-time integration into perioperative and critical care monitoring.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Novel Method for Cardiac Output and Vascular Parameters Estimation Using Peripheral Arterial Waveforms: Integrating Windkessel Model via \(\boldsymbol{\alpha }\)-parameter identification

  • Rami Taheri,
  • Benoit Haut

摘要

Purpose

Conventional pulse-contour analysis estimates cardiac output ( \(CO\) CO ) from arterial pressure waveforms but often relies on demographic calibration or black-box modeling, which limits physiological interpretability and generalizability. This study aims to develop and validate a structurally identifiable model that simultaneously estimates \(CO\) CO and vascular parameters from peripheral arterial pressure waveforms.

Methods

The proposed framework is based on a four-element Windkessel model reformulated through \(\alpha \) α -parameters ( \({\alpha }_{C},{\alpha }_{R},{\alpha }_{L}, {\alpha }_{\tau }\) α C , α R , α L , α τ ) that encapsulate arterial compliance, resistive and inertial loads, and pressure decay dynamics. Radial peripheral arterial pressure (pABP) waveforms are preprocessed, smoothed, converted into a periodic representation, and fitted to the Windkessel model to extract \(\alpha \) α -parameters. Combined with biometric covariates, these parameters serve as inputs to a generalized linear model (Gamma distribution, identity link) trained to estimate \(CO\) CO . The estimated \(CO\) CO is subsequently reinjected into the \(\alpha \) α -parameter expressions to derive arterial compliance ( \(C\) C ), characteristic impedance ( \({R}_{z}\) R z ), distal resistance ( \({R}_{dis}\) R dis ), and inertance ( \(L\) L ).

Results

Internal validation against the EV1000 pulse-contour reference yields an \({R}^{2}=0.82\) R 2 = 0.82 , negligible bias (− 0.02 \(\text{L}.{\text{min}}^{-1}\) L . min - 1 ), and a percentage error ( \(PE\) PE ) of 26.17%, meeting the clinical interchangeability criterion ( \(PE\) PE < 30%). External evaluation on an independent Vigileo dataset achieves \({R}^{2}=0.72\) R 2 = 0.72 and \(PE\) PE = 28.41% without retraining, confirming robustness across platforms.

Conclusion

The \(\alpha \) α -parameterized Windkessel framework provides a physiologically interpretable, data-efficient, and calibration-free alternative for \(CO\) CO estimation. Beyond \(CO\) CO , it simultaneously quantifies \(C\) C , \({R}_{z}\) R z , \({R}_{dis}\) R dis , and \(L\) L , offering a comprehensive and mechanistically grounded hemodynamic profile from a single peripheral arterial pressure signal, suitable for real-time integration into perioperative and critical care monitoring.